Testing the ICA mixing matrix based on inter-subject or inter-session consistency

Independent component analysis (ICA) is increasingly used for analyzing brain imaging data. ICA typically gives a large number of components, many of which may be just random, due to insufficient sample size, violations of the model, or algorithmic problems. Few methods are available for computing the statistical significance (reliability) of the components. We propose to approach this problem by performing ICA separately on a number of subjects, and finding components which are sufficiently consistent (similar) over subjects. Similarity is defined here as the similarity of the mixing coefficients, which usually correspond to spatial patterns in EEG and MEG. The threshold of what is "sufficient" is rigorously defined by a null hypothesis under which the independent components are random orthogonal components in the whitened space. Components which are consistent in different subjects are found by clustering under the constraint that a cluster can only contain one source from each subject, and by constraining the number of the false positives based on the null hypothesis. Instead of different subjects, the method can also be applied on different recording sessions from a single subject. The testing method is particularly applicable to EEG and MEG analysis.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  A group model for stable multi-subject ICA on fMRI datasets , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Spatial independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging time-series: characterization of the cortical components , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[9]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[10]  R. Fisher FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATION , 1915 .

[11]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd Edition. , 1985 .

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  R. Simes,et al.  An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1986 .

[16]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of the human brain—natural viewing conditions reveal a time-based anatomy of the brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  A resampling approach to estimate the stability of one-dimensional or multidimensional independent components , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Comprehension of audiovisual speech: Data-based sorting of independent components of fMRI activity , 2010 .

[19]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of short-time Fourier transforms for spontaneous EEG/MEG analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[22]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Taulu,et al.  Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.

[24]  A. Hyvärinen,et al.  Characterization of neuromagnetic brain rhythms over time scales of minutes using spatial independent component analysis , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[25]  E. Formisanoa,et al.  Spatial independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging timeseries: characterization of the cortical components , 2002 .