When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top‐down processing on matching fingerprints

Twenty-seven participants made a total of 2,484 judgments whether a pair of fingerprints matched or not. A quarter of the trials acted as a control condition. The rest of the trials included top-down influences aimed at biasing the participants to find a match. These manipulations included emotional background stories of crimes and explicitly disturbing photographs from crime scenes, as well as subliminal messages. The data revealed that participants were affected by the top-down manipulations and as a result were more likely to make match judgments. However, the increased likelihood of making match judgments was limited to ambiguous fingerprints. The top-down manipulations were not able to contradict clear non-matching fingerprints. Hence, such contextual information actively biases the ways gaps are filled, but was not sufficient to override clear bottom-up information.

[1]  Robert B. Stacey Report on the Erroneous Fingerprint Individualization in the Madrid Train Bombing Case , 2005 .

[2]  Paul G. Davies,et al.  Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Jane Goodman-Delahunty,et al.  The Influence of Gruesome Verbal Evidence on Mock Juror Verdicts , 2004 .

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[5]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Anxiety-related bias in the classification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. , 2002, Emotion.

[6]  Mohammad S. Alam,et al.  Real time fingerprint identification , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 2000. Engineering Tomorrow (Cat. No.00CH37093).

[7]  I. Dror,et al.  Object identification as a function of discriminability and learning presentations: the effect of stimulus similarity and canonical frame alignment on aircraft identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion , 2000 .

[9]  I. Dror,et al.  To be or Not to be: The Effects of Aging Stereotypes on the Will to Live , 2000, Omega.

[10]  David R. Ashbaugh,et al.  Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology , 1999 .

[11]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Simon A. Cole,et al.  What Counts for Identity? The Historical Origins of the Methodology of Latent Fingerprint Identification , 1999, Science in Context.

[13]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Cognitive Bias to Internal Sources of Information in Anxiety , 1998 .

[14]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Age degradation in top-down processing: identifying objects from canonical and noncanonical viewpoints. , 1998, Experimental aging research.

[15]  A. Mathews,et al.  Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  Paula M. Niedenthal,et al.  Being happy and seeing "happy": Emotional state mediates visual word recognition. , 1997 .

[17]  T. Pincus,et al.  Pain patients' bias in the interpretation of ambiguous homophones. , 1996, The British journal of medical psychology.

[18]  D. Roberson,et al.  Emotional Value of Information and its Relevance in the Interpretation of Homophones in Anxiety , 1996 .

[19]  Paula M. Niedenthal,et al.  Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity by Emotional State , 1995 .

[20]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[21]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases , 1993 .

[22]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  A. Richards,et al.  Anxiety and the spelling and use in sentences of threat/neutral homophones , 1993 .

[24]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Cognitive functioning and anxiety , 1987, Psychological research.

[25]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[26]  J. Darley,et al.  A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. , 1983 .

[27]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[28]  O. G. Selfridge,et al.  Pattern recognition and modern computers , 1899, AFIPS '55 (Western).