Assessing life cycle environmental implications of polymer nanocomposites

Research into the holistic evaluation of emerging nanotechnologies using systems analysis is pivotal for guiding their safe and sustainable development. This work presents the first energetic life cycle assessment of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) that evaluates both thermoplastic and thermoset resins. Both simple carbon nanofiber (CNF) and carbon nanofiber-glass fiber (CNF-GF) hybrid nanocomposites are evaluated and compared with steel. The issue of life cycle inventory is tackled based on published literature and best available engineering information. A cradle-to-gate comparison reveals that CNF reinforced PNCs are 1.3-10 times more energy intensive than steel and thus the product use phase is likely to govern whether any net savings in life cycle energy consumption can be realized for PNC based products. A case study involving the use of CNF and CNF-GF reinforced PNCs in the body panels of automobiles is further presented and highlights that the use of PNCs with lower CNF loading ratios may result in net life cycle fossil energy savings relative to steel. Other factors such as cost, toxicity impact of CNF, and end-of-life issues specific to CNFs need to be considered to evaluate the final economic and environmental performance of CNF reinforced PNC materials. The results of this study can easily be used for evaluating other CNF based PNC applications.

[1]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Comparative life cycle studies on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based composites as potential replacement for conventional petrochemical plastics. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Toshiaki Natsuki,et al.  Conductivity stability of carbon nanofiber/unsaturated polyester nanocomposites , 2007 .

[3]  Braden Allenby,et al.  Industrial ecology and the automobile , 1995 .

[4]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Conductive long fibre reinforced thermoplastics by using carbon nanofibres , 2006 .

[5]  Christian Capello,et al.  Energy Consumption During Nanoparticle Production: How Economic is Dry Synthesis? , 2006 .

[6]  Gang Zhou.  Preparation, structure, and properties of advanced polymer composites with long fibers and nanoparticles , 2007 .

[7]  Peter Morgan,et al.  Carbon Fibers and Their Composites , 2005 .

[8]  Lester B Lave,et al.  Life cycle economic and environmental implications of using nanocomposites in automobiles. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  K. D. de Jong,et al.  Carbon Nanofibers: Catalytic Synthesis and Applications , 2000 .

[10]  Gary G. Tibbetts,et al.  Heat treating carbon nanofibers for optimal composite performance , 2006 .

[11]  George Marsh,et al.  Facing up to the recycling challenge , 2001 .

[12]  L.J. Lee,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Analysis and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Nanofibers Production , 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment.

[13]  V. Colvin.  The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Gary G. Tibbetts,et al.  Surface treatments for improving the mechanical properties of carbon nanofiber/thermoplastic composites , 2003 .

[15]  Theodore J. Reinhart,et al.  Engineered materials handbook , 1987 .

[16]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Life cycle benefits of using nanotechnology to stabilize platinum-group metal particles in automotive catalysts. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Transport properties of polymer-vapour grown carbon fibre composites , 2000 .

[18]  L. Forró,et al.  Cellular toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials. , 2006, Nano letters.

[19]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Engineering materials 1: an introduction to their properties and applications , 1996 .

[20]  Chris D. Rudd,et al.  A fluidised-bed process for the recovery of glass fibres from scrap thermoset composites , 2000 .

[21]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics , 2001 .