The Denatured State Dictates the Topology of Two Proteins with Almost Identical Sequence but Different Native Structure and Function*

The protein folding problem is often studied by comparing the mechanisms of proteins sharing the same structure but different sequence. The recent design of the two proteins GA88 and GB88, displaying different structures and functions while sharing 88% sequence identity (49 out of 56 amino acids), allows the unique opportunity for a complementary approach. At which stage of its folding pathway does a protein commit to a given topology? Which residues are crucial in directing folding mechanisms to a given structure? By using a combination of biophysical and computational techniques, we have characterized the folding of both GA88 and GB88. We show that, contrary to expectation, GB88, characterized by a native α+β fold, displays in the denatured state a content of native-like helical structure greater than GA88, which is all-α in its native state. Both experiments and simulations indicate that such residual structure may be tuned by changing pH. Thus, despite the high sequence identity, the folding pathways for these two proteins appear to diverge as early as in the denatured state. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby protein topology is committed very early along the folding pathway, being imprinted in the residual structure of the denatured state.

[1]  P. Alexander,et al.  A minimal sequence code for switching protein structure and function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Engineered symmetric connectivity of secondary structure elements highlights malleability of protein folding pathways. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  J. Clarke,et al.  Different Members of a Simple Three-Helix Bundle Protein Family Have Very Different Folding Rate Constants and Fold by Different Mechanisms , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Comparison of successive transition states for folding reveals alternative early folding pathways of two homologous proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Ellinor Haglund,et al.  Changes of Protein Folding Pathways by Circular Permutation , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  John Orban,et al.  NMR structures of two designed proteins with high sequence identity but different fold and function , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  From the first protein structures to our current knowledge of protein folding: delights and scepticisms , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[8]  M. Brunori,et al.  The folding pathway of an engineered circularly permuted PDZ domain. , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[9]  Alan R Davidson,et al.  A folding space odyssey , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  John Orban,et al.  The design and characterization of two proteins with 88% sequence identity but different structure and function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  P. Jemth,et al.  A conserved folding mechanism for PDZ domains , 2007, FEBS letters.

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  The Highly Cooperative Folding of Small Naturally Occurring Proteins Is Likely the Result of Natural Selection , 2007, Cell.

[13]  M. Oliveberg,et al.  Malleability of protein folding pathways: a simple reason for complex behaviour. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Folding mechanisms of proteins with high sequence identity but different folds. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[15]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  BPPred: A Web‐based computational tool for predicting biophysical parameters of proteins , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Common motifs and topological effects in the protein folding transition state. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  A. R. Fersht,et al.  Solution structure of a protein denatured state and folding intermediate , 2005, Nature.

[18]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Simulation and experiment conspire to reveal cryptic intermediates and a slide from the nucleation-condensation to framework mechanism of folding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  M. Brunori,et al.  An Obligatory Intermediate in the Folding Pathway of Cytochrome c552 from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Charles Seife,et al.  What Is the Universe Made Of? , 2005, Science.

[21]  P. Alexander,et al.  Engineering subtilisin into a fluoride-triggered processing protease useful for one-step protein purification. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[22]  David A C Beck,et al.  Methods for molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding/unfolding in solution. , 2004, Methods.

[23]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[24]  M. Brunori,et al.  Exploring the Cytochrome c Folding Mechanism , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  The complete folding pathway of a protein from nanoseconds to microseconds , 2003, Nature.

[26]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Evidence for sequential barriers and obligatory intermediates in apparent two-state protein folding. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  D. Baker,et al.  Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Christopher M. Dobson,et al.  Mutational analysis of acylphosphatase suggests the importance of topology and contact order in protein folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[30]  Luis Serrano,et al.  The folding transition state between SH3 domains is conformationally restricted and evolutionarily conserved , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  David Baker,et al.  Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[32]  E. Cota,et al.  Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway. , 1999, Structure.

[33]  Suganthi Balasubramanian,et al.  Protein alchemy: Changing β-sheet into α-helix , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Calibration and Testing of a Water Model for Simulation of the Molecular Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids in Solution , 1997 .

[35]  M. Oliveberg,et al.  Transient aggregates in protein folding are easily mistaken for folding intermediates. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  L Serrano,et al.  Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the AGADIR model of alpha-helix formation: comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms. , 1997, Biopolymers.

[37]  A. Li,et al.  Identification and characterization of the unfolding transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 by molecular dynamics simulations. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  M. Levitt,et al.  Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution , 1995 .

[39]  A. Li,et al.  Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  G. Rose,et al.  Protein folding: Predicting predicting , 1994, Proteins.

[41]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[42]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[44]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Unfolding free energy changes determined by the linear extrapolation method. 1. Unfolding of phenylmethanesulfonyl alpha-chymotrypsin using different denaturants. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[45]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[46]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  C. Tanford Protein denaturation. , 1968, Advances in protein chemistry.