Sociotechnical transition to smart energy: The case of Samso 1997–2030

This case study analyses an ongoing practical transition to a smart energy system. The Danish island of Samso, with 3700 inhabitants, aims for a fossil fuel free energy system in the year 2030. Owing to natural limitations, it is necessary to exploit the available energy sources in a manner, which requires careful planning. Furthermore, civic engagement is necessary for a democratic transition to a smart energy system. Therefore the transition has a social side and a technical side, which is analysed. The analysis applies the causal loop diagram of an urban model in order to explain the inner workings of the island community. The analysis illustrates many planning elements, such as political energy targets, sociotechnical priorities, energy vision, energy balance, energy action plan, and examples of demand-side management. The analysis shows that the current municipal plan is comprehensive, but not coherent. It will be necessary to consider trade-offs, that is, set a goal that would balance housing, jobs, agriculture, tourism, biomass and energy. An open question for further research is whether this insight from Samso can be scaled or replicated to other regions.

[1]  Sven Stremke,et al.  Urban Planning for a Renewable Energy Future: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities from a Design Perspective , 2012 .

[2]  P. A. Østergaard,et al.  Assessment and evaluation of flexible demand in a Danish future energy scenario , 2014 .

[3]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[4]  Kate Burningham,et al.  The electric commons: A qualitative study of community accountability , 2017 .

[5]  Woodrow W. Clark,et al.  Sustainable development in practice , 2007 .

[6]  B. Mathiesen,et al.  100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth , 2011 .

[7]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[8]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Renewable Energy Systems: A Smart Energy Systems Approach to the Choice and Modeling of 100% Renewable Solutions , 2014 .

[9]  Henrik Lund,et al.  The economic crisis and sustainable development: The design of job creation strategies by use of concrete institutional economics , 2012 .

[10]  Toke Haunstrup Christensen,et al.  The challenge of time shifting energy demand practices: Insights from Denmark , 2016 .

[11]  Thomas Berker,et al.  A traveler’s guide to smart grids and the social sciences☆ , 2015 .

[12]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Renewable heating strategies and their consequences for storage and grid infrastructures comparing a smart grid to a smart energy systems approach , 2018 .

[13]  George P. Richardson,et al.  How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process , 2011 .

[14]  J. Jantzen,et al.  Household Energy Checks , 2014 .

[15]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[16]  Alan K. Graham,et al.  Introduction to Urban Dynamics , 1976 .

[17]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[18]  Andra Blumberga,et al.  Novel tools to study socio-technical transitions in energy systems , 2017 .

[19]  E. Holmes,et al.  Energy balance sheets. , 1956, East African medical journal.

[20]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Chapter 6 – Analysis: Smart Energy Systems and Infrastructures , 2014 .

[21]  Paolo Cottone,et al.  One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in Europe: The quest for a cultural approach , 2016 .

[22]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Samsø Energy Vision 2030: Converting Samsø to 100% Renewable Energy , 2015 .