Identifying and prioritizing uncertainties: patient and clinician engagement in the identification of research questions.

BACKGROUND To arrive at an agreed, prioritized ranking of treatment uncertainties in asthma that need further research, by developing a collaboration of patients, carers and clinicians, facilitated by the James Lind Alliance Working Partnership between Asthma UK and the British Thoracic Society. METHODS A four-step procedure: (1) establish a collaborative Working Partnership; (2) identify and collect treatment uncertainties by using a patient survey and analysing existing systematic reviews, clinical guidelines and query-answering services; (3) categorize uncertainties; and (4) convene a workshop using a nominal group process to establish a ranked prioritization of treatment uncertainties in asthma. FINDINGS Agreement and rankings were reached for 10 treatment uncertainties. The highest was given to the uncertainty surrounding the adverse effects of inhaled and oral steroids. The top three priorities dealt with clinical management issues, where uncertainties still exist, namely concerns about the side effects of inhaled and oral steroids, how to manage asthma when other illnesses exist or how to rely on personal decisions in an ever-changing illness (self-management). INTERPRETATION The key outcome is the generation of a prioritized list of treatment uncertainties in asthma, agreed by a collaboration of patients and health professionals, to inform the commissioning of new research. Such a large number of patient-identified treatment uncertainties had not previously been identified in the literature, an indication perhaps that asthma self-management is a neglected research area. Whether the results have an influence of research funding decisions is not yet known.

[1]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  E. Taal,et al.  Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis--progress at OMERACT 7. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. , 2004, Health policy.

[4]  J. Scadding,et al.  The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trials , 2004, The Lancet.

[5]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[6]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  Well informed uncertainties about the effects of treatments , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Mike Thomas,et al.  Where next in clinical asthma research? An Asthma UK consultation on clinical asthma research strategy. , 2004 .

[8]  H. Christensen,et al.  Research Priorities in Mental Health, Part 2: An Evaluation of the Current Research Effort Against Stakeholders' Priorities , 2002, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[9]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Exploring the priorities of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[10]  S. Oliver How can health service users contribute to the NHS research and development programme? , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  I. Chalmers The perinatal research agenda: whose priorities? , 1991, Birth.