Sensitivity Analyses for Ecological Regression

In many ecological regression studies investigating associations between environmental exposures and health outcomes, the observed relative risks are in the range 1.0-2.0. The interpretation of such small relative risks is difficult due to a variety of biases--some of which are unique to ecological data, since they arise from within-area variability in exposures/confounders. The potential for residual spatial dependence, due to unmeasured confounders and/or data anomalies with spatial structure, must also be considered, though it often will be of secondary importance when compared to the likely effects of unmeasured confounding and within-area variability in exposures/confounders. Methods for addressing sensitivity to these issues are described, along with an approach for assessing the implications of spatial dependence. An ecological study of the association between myocardial infarction and magnesium is critically reevaluated to determine potential sources of bias. It is argued that the sophistication of the statistical analysis should not outweigh the quality of the data, and that finessing models for spatial dependence will often not be merited in the context of ecological regression.

[1]  N. G. Best,et al.  Spatial Poisson Regression for Health and Exposure Data Measured at Disparate Resolutions , 2000 .

[2]  D. Clayton,et al.  Bayesian analysis of space-time variation in disease risk. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[4]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  Magnesium in drinking water supplies and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in north west England , 1999 .

[5]  J Wakefield,et al.  Magnesium in drinking water supplies and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in north west England , 1999, Heart.

[6]  Ruth Salway,et al.  A statistical framework for ecological and aggregate studies , 2001 .

[7]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Degree of confounding bias related to smoking, ethnic group, and socioeconomic status in estimates of the associations between occupation and cancer. , 1988, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[9]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[10]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health in Scotland. , 1990, Health bulletin.

[11]  Patrick J. Heagerty,et al.  Window Subsampling of Estimating Functions with Application to Regression Models , 2000 .

[12]  C Guihenneuc-Jouyaux,et al.  Biases in ecological studies: utility of including within-area distribution of confounders. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  A hierarchical aggregate data model with spatially correlated disease rates. , 2002, Biometrics.

[14]  I Kleinschmidt,et al.  The Small Area Health Statistics Unit: a national facility for investigating health around point sources of environmental pollution in the United Kingdom. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[15]  J. Robins,et al.  Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. , 1998, Biometrics.

[17]  D Hémon,et al.  Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations. , 1987, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  G. Comstock.  Water hardness and cardiovascular diseases. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  S Greenland,et al.  Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  J. Wakefield,et al.  The Bayesian Modeling of Disease Risk in Relation to a Point Source , 2001 .

[21]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[22]  C Montomoli,et al.  Spatial correlation in ecological analysis. , 1993, International journal of epidemiology.

[23]  N. Pearce,et al.  Environmental epidemiology: challenges and opportunities. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  D. Cook,et al.  Multiple regression in geographical mortality studies, with allowance for spatially correlated errors. , 1983, Biometrics.

[25]  Ross L. Prentice,et al.  Aggregate data studies of disease risk factors , 1995 .