Uncovering multi-site identifiability based on resting-state functional connectomes

Multi-site studies are becoming important to increase statistical power, enhance generalizability, and to improve the likelihood of pooling relevant subgroups together-activities which are otherwise limited by the availability of subjects or funds at a single site. Even with harmonized imaging sequences, site-dependent variability can mask the advantages of these multi-site studies. The aim of this study was to assess multi-site reproducibility in resting-state functional connectivity "fingerprints", and to improve identifiability of functional connectomes. The individual fingerprinting of functional connectivity profiles is promising due to its potential as a robust neuroimaging biomarker with which to draw single-subject inferences. We evaluated, on two independent multi-site datasets, individual fingerprints in test-retest visit pairs within and across two sites and present a generalized framework based on principal component analysis to improve identifiability. Those principal components that maximized differential identifiability of a training dataset were used as an orthogonal connectivity basis to reconstruct the individual functional connectomes of training and validation sets. The optimally reconstructed functional connectomes showed a substantial improvement in individual fingerprinting of the subjects within and across the two sites and test-retest visit pairs relative to the original data. A notable increase in ICC values for functional edges and resting-state networks were also observed for reconstructed functional connectomes. Improvements in identifiability were not found to be affected by global signal regression. Post-hoc analyses assessed the effect of the number of fMRI volumes on identifiability and showed that multi-site differential identifiability was for all cases maximized after optimal reconstruction. Finally, the generalizability of the optimal set of orthogonal basis of each dataset was evaluated through a leave-one-out procedure. Overall, results demonstrate that the data-driven framework presented in this study systematically improves identifiability in resting-state functional connectomes in multi-site studies.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  A. Toga,et al.  Multisite neuroimaging trials , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  Saad Jbabdi,et al.  Connectivity Fingerprints: From Areal Descriptions to Abstract Spaces , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  R. Peeters,et al.  Multi-center reproducibility of structural, diffusion tensor, and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging measures , 2018, Neuroradiology.

[11]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Theo G. M. van Erp,et al.  Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Longitudinal reproducibility of default-mode network connectivity in healthy elderly participants: A multicentric resting-state fMRI study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Sources of group differences in functional connectivity: An investigation applied to autism spectrum disorder , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Individual-specific features of brain systems identified with resting state functional correlations , 2017, NeuroImage.

[17]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository , 2016, NeuroImage.

[18]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  L. Shah,et al.  Reliability and reproducibility of individual differences in functional connectivity acquired during task and resting state , 2016, Brain and behavior.

[20]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Task-based dynamic functional connectivity: Recent findings and open questions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[21]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Johann Daniel Kruschwitz,et al.  Evaluating the replicability, specificity, and generalizability of connectome fingerprints , 2017, NeuroImage.

[27]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[28]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The Structural and Functional Connectome and Prediction of Risk for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults , 2015, Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports.

[29]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Multisite reliability of cognitive BOLD data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[31]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Reducing interscanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: Controlling for signal-to-fluctuation-noise-ratio (SFNR) differences , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  S. Debener,et al.  Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[35]  O. Sporns Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Neuronal Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[37]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  Saige Rutherford,et al.  Basic Units of Inter-Individual Variation in Resting State Connectomes , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[40]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  r Human Brain Mapping 29:958–972 (2008) r Test–Retest and Between-Site Reliability in a Multicenter fMRI Study , 2022 .

[41]  Andreas Heinz,et al.  Test–retest reliability of resting-state connectivity network characteristics using fMRI and graph theoretical measures , 2012, NeuroImage.

[42]  Simon Schwab,et al.  Functional connectivity in BOLD and CBF data: Similarity and reliability of resting brain networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[43]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Test‐retest reliability of the default mode network in a multi‐centric fMRI study of healthy elderly: Effects of data‐driven physiological noise correction techniques , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[44]  John Suckling,et al.  Components of variance in a multicentre functional MRI study and implications for calculation of statistical power , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[45]  Xue Wang,et al.  Reproducibility of Structural, Resting-State BOLD and DTI Data between Identical Scanners , 2012, PloS one.

[46]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Randy L. Gollub,et al.  Multi-site characterization of an fMRI working memory paradigm: Reliability of activation indices , 2010, NeuroImage.

[48]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[49]  Josef Ling,et al.  Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[52]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Reproducibility of functional MR imaging: preliminary results of prospective multi-institutional study performed by Biomedical Informatics Research Network. , 2005, Radiology.

[53]  J. Voyvodic Activation mapping as a percentage of local excitation: fMRI stability within scans, between scans and across field strengths. , 2006, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[54]  Ian Marshall,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reproducibility and variance components across visits and scanning sites with a finger tapping task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  Kevin Dewey,et al.  Establishment and results of a magnetic resonance quality assurance program for the pediatric brain tumor consortium. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[56]  Fbirn,et al.  A multi-site resting state fMRI study on the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations in schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[57]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Individual differences in functional connectivity during naturalistic viewing conditions , 2016 .

[58]  A. Saykin,et al.  Towards Subject and Diagnostic Identifiability in the Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum Based on Functional Connectomes , 2018, GRAIL/Beyond-MIC@MICCAI.

[59]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[60]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Rician Noise Removal by Non-Local Means Filtering for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio MRI: Applications to DT-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[61]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[62]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[63]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[64]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[65]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Mapping the functional connectome traits of levels of consciousness , 2016, NeuroImage.

[66]  J. Zimmermann,et al.  Subject specificity of the correlation between large-scale structural and functional connectivity , 2018, Network Neuroscience.

[67]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Robust Rician noise estimation for MR images , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[68]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  ICA-based artifact removal diminishes scan site differences in multi-center resting-state fMRI , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[69]  Yong He,et al.  Graph Theoretical Analysis of Functional Brain Networks: Test-Retest Evaluation on Short- and Long-Term Resting-State Functional MRI Data , 2011, PloS one.

[70]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  An Optimized Blockwise Nonlocal Means Denoising Filter for 3-D Magnetic Resonance Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[71]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Personalized Neuroscience: Common and Individual-Specific Features in Functional Brain Networks , 2018, Neuron.

[72]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Extracting orthogonal subject- and condition-specific signatures from fMRI data using whole-brain effective connectivity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[73]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[74]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[75]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI Results across Four Institutions Using a Spatial Working Memory Task , 1998, NeuroImage.