Fragility analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete bridge pier with external aluminum dissipators

A novel self-centering prestressed concrete pier with external energy dissipators has been developed to realize seismic resilient performance and enhanced corrosion-resisting property. Self-centering capacity of the pier is provided by the unbonded post-tensioned tendons and damage is mostly concentrated on the replaceable dissipators. To investigate the seismic behavior of the proposed pier, a detailed analytical model considering interface opening and dissipator deformation was developed and verified through existing cyclic load tests. Based on the proposed model, a prototype reinforced concrete pier and a self-centering prestressed concrete pier with similar backbone curves are designed, and fragility analyses are conducted on the two piers through incremental dynamic analysis. One maximum drift-based performance limit state (i.e. collapse prevention) and two residual drift-based performance limit states (i.e. emergent usage and reconstruction) are defined for seismic capacity evaluation. Fragility curves indicate that the self-centering prestressed concrete pier has a slightly higher peak drift demand owing to its inferior dissipating capacity as compared with the reinforced concrete pier, while sustains a much lower residual drift demand due to its inherent self-centering characteristic.

[1]  Wael Zatar,et al.  RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENTS OF CONCRETE BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO NEAR FIELD EARTHQUAKES , 2002 .

[2]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Plastic Hinge Integration Methods for Force-Based Beam¿Column Elements , 2006 .

[3]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[4]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Unbonded Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Piers. I: Monotonic and Cyclic Analyses , 2003 .

[5]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Performance‐based earthquake engineering assessment of a self‐centering, post‐tensioned concrete bridge system , 2011 .

[6]  Norio Inoue,et al.  Shaking Table Tests of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1998 .

[7]  B. Stojadinović,et al.  RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENT AND POST EARTHQUAKE CAPACITY OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 2002 .

[8]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[9]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Cyclic Response of Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Columns with Ductile Fiber-Reinforced Concrete , 2004 .

[10]  L. L. Dodd,et al.  MODEL FOR PREDICTING CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF REINFORCING STEEL , 1995 .

[11]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Residual Displacement Response Spectrum , 1998 .

[12]  Mohamed A. ElGawady,et al.  Performance-based seismic design of unbonded precast post-tensioned concrete filled GFRP tube piers , 2013 .

[13]  Mohamed A. ElGawady,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Posttensioned Concrete-Filled Fiber Tubes , 2010 .

[14]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development , 2000 .

[15]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Quasi‐static and pseudo‐dynamic testing of unbonded post‐tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters , 2009 .

[16]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[17]  John F. Stanton,et al.  A HYBRID REINFORCED PRECAST FRAME FOR SEISMIC REGIONS , 1997 .

[18]  伊藤 義人,et al.  Lifecycle Environmental Impact and Cost Analyses of Steel Bridge Piers with Seismic Risk , 2005 .

[19]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Unbonded Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Piers. II: Seismic Analyses , 2003 .

[20]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Design, Modeling, and Experimental Response of Seismic Resistant Bridge Piers with Posttensioned Dissipating Connections , 2007 .

[21]  Kuo-Chun Chang,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Pre-Cast Pre-Stressed Segmental Concrete Bridge Columns , 2006 .

[22]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[23]  Tong Guo,et al.  Theoretical analysis of self-centering concrete piers with external dissipators , 2015 .

[24]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Hysteretic Model Development and Seismic Response of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast CFT Segmental Bridge Columns , 2007 .

[25]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test Building , 1999 .

[26]  Franco Braga,et al.  Analytical Stress—Strain Relationship for Concrete Confined by Steel Stirrups and/or FRP Jackets , 2006 .

[27]  M J N Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF PRECAST CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BRIDGE COLUMNS , 2002 .

[28]  G A Chang,et al.  SEISMIC ENERGY BASED FATIGUE DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF BRIDGE COLUMNS: PART I - EVALUATION OF SEISMIC CAPACITY. TECHNICAL REPORT , 1994 .

[29]  M. ElGawady,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Self-Centering Precast Segmental Bridge Bents , 2011 .

[30]  Tong Guo,et al.  Cyclic Load Tests on Self-Centering Concrete Pier with External Dissipators and Enhanced Durability , 2016 .

[31]  W. Ramberg,et al.  Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters , 1943 .