Corporate Finance Policies and Social Networks

Social network theory suggests that individuals’ preferences and decisions are affected by the actions of others. Such decision externalities arise from constraints on our ability to process or obtain costly information. This paper provides evidence that managers are influenced by their social peers when making corporate finance policy decisions. I create a matrix of social ties using data on current employment, past employment, education, and other activities for key executives and directors of the board for US companies. I find that the more social connections two companies share with each other, the more similar both their level and change over time in investment. Furthermore, companies positioned more centrally in the social networks invest in a less idiosyncratic way. Finally, more socially connected firms exhibit better economic performance. To address endogeneity concerns, I find that two companies behave less similarly when an individual who connects them dies.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[2]  Jeffrey R. Brown,et al.  Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation , 2007 .

[3]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment , 2002 .

[4]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[5]  E. Fama,et al.  Testing Tradeoff and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt , 1999 .

[6]  Christopher J. Malloy,et al.  The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  M. McPherson,et al.  BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .

[8]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[10]  Bang Dang Nguyen,et al.  Does the Rolodex Matter? Corporate Elite's Small World and the Effectiveness of Boards of Directors , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Byoung-Hyoun Hwang,et al.  It Pays to Have Friends , 2008 .

[12]  Michael L. Lemmon,et al.  Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Structure , 2006 .

[13]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[14]  Entrenchment, Governance, and the Stock Price Reaction to Sudden Executive Deaths , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel Ferreira,et al.  A Theory of Friendly Boards , 2007 .

[16]  Cesare Fracassi,et al.  External Networking and Internal Firm Governance , 2012 .

[17]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies , 2003 .

[18]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning , 1995 .

[19]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Social networks and trust , 1999 .

[20]  Avanidhar Subrahmanyam,et al.  Social Networks and Corporate Governance , 2008 .

[21]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Social Networks and Organizations , 2012 .

[22]  Murray Z. Frank,et al.  Corporate Leverage: How Much Do Managers Really Matter? , 2007 .