Urban ethnohydrology: Cultural knowledge of water quality and water management in a desert city

Popular concern over water quality has important implications for public water management because it can both empower water utilities to improve service but also limit their ability to make changes. In the desert city of Phoenix, Arizona, obtaining sufficient high-quality water resources for a growing urban population poses a major challenge. Decision makers and urban hydrologists are aware of these challenges to water sustainability but the range of acceptable policy and management options available to them is constrained by public opinion. Therefore, this study examines cultural models of water quality and water management, termed ethnohydrology, among urban residents. The study yields three key findings. First, urban residents appear to have a shared model of ethnohydrology which holds that a) there are significant water quality risks associated with low financial investments in city-wide water treatment and the desert location of Phoenix, and b) government monitoring and management combined with household-level water treatment can yield water of an acceptable quality. Second, people with high incomes are more likely to engage in expensive water filtration activities and to agree with the cultural ethnohydrology model found. Third, people living in communities that are highly concerned about water quality are less likely to share high agreement around ethnohydrology. The results have implications for water policy making and planning, particularly in disadvantaged and vulnerable communities where water quality is perceived to be low.

[1]  S. Barthel,et al.  Recalling Urban Nature : Linking City People to Ecosystem Services , 2008 .

[2]  Timothy W. Collins,et al.  The geography of despair: Environmental racism the the making of South Phoenix, Arizona, USA , 2005 .

[3]  V. Nazarea Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives , 1999 .

[4]  R. D'Andrade Modal Responses and Cultural Expertise , 1987 .

[5]  D. Medin,et al.  Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Gery W. Ryan,et al.  Successive Free Listing: Using Multiple Free Lists to Generate Explanatory Models , 2000 .

[7]  D. Puett,et al.  The Maya ICBG: Drug Discovery, Medical Ethnobiology, And Alternative Forms Of Economic Development In The Highland Maya Region Of Chiapas, Mexico , 1999 .

[8]  S. Henson,et al.  Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: focus group analyses , 2005, BMC public health.

[9]  A. Ellis,et al.  Estimating future runoff levels for a semi-arid fluvial system in central Arizona, USA , 2008 .

[10]  P Slovic,et al.  Perception of ecological risk to water environments. , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  E. Hunn,et al.  The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification , 1982 .

[12]  J. Niemczynowicz Urban hydrology and water management – present and future challenges , 1999 .

[13]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy , 1986 .

[14]  R. Boelens,et al.  Searching for equity: conceptions of justice and equity in peasant irrigation. , 1998 .

[15]  Andrea M. Dietrich,et al.  Using customer feedback for improved water quality and infrastructure monitoring , 2007 .

[16]  M. Miller,et al.  Cultural Consensus Analysis and Environmental Anthropology: Yellowfin Tuna Fishery Management in Hawaii , 2004 .

[17]  P. Gelles Water and Power in Highland Peru: The Cultural Politics of Irrigation and Development , 2000 .

[18]  Kelly D. Alley,et al.  Connecting local environmental knowledge and land use practices: A human ecosystem approach to urbanization in West Georgia , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[19]  J. Boster,et al.  Form or Function: A Comparison of Expert and Novice Judgments of Similarity Among Fish , 1989 .

[20]  William Back,et al.  Hydromythology and ethnohydrology in the New World. , 1981 .

[21]  N. Ross Cognitive Aspects of Intergenerational Change: Mental Models, Cultural Change, and Environmental Behavior among the Lacandon Maya of Southern Mexico , 2002 .

[22]  E. M. Costa-Neto The Use of Insects in Folk Medicine in the State of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil, with Notes on Insects Reported Elsewhere in Brazilian Folk Medicine , 2002 .

[23]  victoria reyes -garc,et al.  Market Economy and the Loss of Folk Knowledge of Plant Uses: Estimates from the Tsimane’ of the Bolivian Amazon , 2005 .

[24]  Jeffrey C. Johnson,et al.  Beliefs about and responses to childhood ear infections: a study of parents in eastern North Carolina. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[25]  Susan C. Weller,et al.  Measuring Within- and Between-Group Agreement: Identifying the Proportion of Shared and Unique Beliefs Across Samples , 2002 .

[26]  P. Knox The Restless Urban Landscape: Economic and Sociocultural Change and the Transformation of Metropolitan Washington, DC , 1991 .

[27]  P. Gober Metropolitan Phoenix: Place Making and Community Building in the Desert , 2005 .

[28]  W. Leonard,et al.  Economic Development and Local Ecological Knowledge: A Deadlock? Quantitative Research from a Native Amazonian Society , 2007 .

[29]  S. Weller Shared Knowledge, Intracultural Variation, and Knowledge Aggregation , 1987 .

[30]  Jeffrey C. Johnson,et al.  Finding Common Ground in the Commons: Intracultural Variation in Users' Conceptions of Coastal Fisheries Issues , 2010 .

[31]  R. D'Andrade The Development of Cognitive Anthropology , 1995 .

[32]  B. Berlin,et al.  Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. , 1994 .

[33]  P. Sillitoe Contested Knowledge, Contingent Classification: Animals in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea , 2002 .

[34]  L. Garro Intracultural Variation in Folk Medical Knowledge: A Comparison Between Curers and Noncurers , 1986 .

[35]  Christopher A. Furlow Comparing Indicators of Knowledge within and between Cultural Domains , 2003 .

[36]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  The Myth of a Sub-Culture of Corporal Punishment , 1987 .

[37]  D. Medin,et al.  Epistemological Models and Culture Conflict: Menominee and Euro‐American Hunters in Wisconsin , 2007 .

[38]  D. White,et al.  Comparing Focus Group and Individual Responses on Sensitive Topics: A Study of Water Decision Makers in a Desert City , 2010 .

[39]  Andrea M. Dietrich,et al.  Understanding the basics of tap water taste , 2007 .

[40]  B. Blount,et al.  Ethnoecology: knowledge, resources and rights. , 2000 .

[41]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Water Planning Under Climatic Uncertainty in Phoenix: Why We Need a New Paradigm , 2010 .

[42]  W. Leonard,et al.  Measuring Culture as Shared Knowledge: Do Data Collection Formats Matter? Cultural Knowledge of Plant Uses Among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia , 2004 .

[43]  D. Medin,et al.  Categorization and Reasoning among Tree Experts: Do All Roads Lead to Rome? , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  M. Bell,et al.  The ethnobotany of the Coast Salish Indians of Vancouver Island , 2008, Economic Botany.

[45]  S. Weller Cultural Consensus Theory: Applications and Frequently Asked Questions , 2007 .

[46]  Bryan L Williams,et al.  Do Mexican Americans perceive environmental issues differently than Caucasians: a study of cross-ethnic variation in perceptions related to water in Tucson. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[47]  A. Romney Culture Consensus as a Statistical Model , 1999 .