Influence of Taillight Width on the Ability to Recognize Closing Speed, Closing Distance, and Closing versus Separating
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jeffrey W. Muttart | Swaroop Dinakar | Suntasy Gernhard | Thomas Vadnais | Jeffrey Suway | Michael Kuzel | Thomas Schafer | Mitch Rackers | Jaime Fischer
[1] Dot Hs,et al. The 100 Car Naturalistic Driving Study , 2002 .
[2] Jeffrey W. Muttart,et al. Relationship Between Relative Velocity Detection and Driver Response Times in Vehicle Following Situations , 2005 .
[3] D Regan,et al. Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Daniel V. McGehee,et al. Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.
[5] H Summala,et al. Driving experience and perception of the lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[6] Marco Dozza,et al. Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Study Data: Safer Glances, Driver Inattention, and Crash Risk , 2014 .
[7] R. Mortimer. Perceptual Factors in Rear-End Crashes , 1990 .
[8] Donald L. Fisher,et al. Driver-Eye-Movement-Based Investigation for Improving Work-Zone Safety , 2009 .
[9] Wiel H. Janssen. Driver's Inability to Judge Important Parameters of Leading Vehicle Movement at Night , 1977 .
[10] Suzanne E. Lee,et al. A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF NATURALISTIC LANE-CHANGES , 2004 .
[11] Samuel G Charlton,et al. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[12] Thomas A. Dingus,et al. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .
[13] Ronald R. Knipling,et al. Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance : rear-end crashes , 1993 .
[14] John A. Michon,et al. The perception of lead vehicle movement in darkness , 1976 .
[15] E R Hoffmann,et al. Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[16] Fabrice Vienne,et al. Can Headway Reduction in Fog Be Explained by Impaired Perception of Relative Motion? , 2009, Hum. Factors.
[17] Patricia R. Delucia,et al. Motion Extrapolation of Car-Following Scenes in Younger and Older Drivers , 2006, Hum. Factors.
[18] T A Ranney,et al. Motor vehicle crashes in roadway construction workzones: an analysis using narrative text from insurance claims. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[19] A James McKnight,et al. Young novice drivers: careless or clueless? , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[20] J. Reason. Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[21] M L BRAUNSTEIN,et al. Detection of Vehicle Velocity Changes during Expressway Driving , 1964, Human factors.
[22] Gustav Markkula,et al. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[23] Heikki Summala,et al. DETECTION THRESHOLDS IN CAR FOLLOWING SITUATIONS AND PERIPHERAL VISION: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSITIONING OF VISUALLY DEMANDING IN-CAR DISPLAYS , 1999 .
[24] A J Fisher,et al. THE EFFECT OF PRESENCE LIGHTS ON THE DETECTION OF CHANGE OF VEHICLE HEADWAY , 1978 .