Towards a Psychology of Photography: Dimensions Underlying Aesthetic Appeal of Photographs

With the aim to contribute to the development of a psychology of photography, this study examined what attributes are the major determinants of aesthetic appeal of photographs. Two interlinked experiments were conducted with 564 photographs having a wide range of motifs. Exp. 1 consisted of sorting by aesthetic appeal and adjective generation. In Exp. 2, attribute scaling was collected. Multidimensional scaling analysis of the photographs yielded three dimensions identified with the aid of attribute scales combined with measures of the manifest content of the photographs. The three dimensions were Hedonic Tone–Familiarity, Absence of color, and Expressiveness–Dynamics. The present results suggested that participants' familiarity with the photographs, the types of photographs (Color or Black & White), and the photographs' dynamics all affected participants' judgments of aesthetic appeal. Hedonic Tone and Expressiveness apparently mediated the participants' judgments.

[1]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[3]  Berlyne De,et al.  Dimensions of perception of exotic and pre-renaissance paintings. , 1975 .

[4]  D E Berlyne.  Dimensions of perception of exotic and pre-renaissance paintings. , 1975, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  D. E. Berlyne,et al.  Similarity and Preference Judgments of Indian and Canadian Subjects Exposed to Western Paintings , 1976 .

[6]  I. Gordon,et al.  Dimensions of the perception of art: verbal scales and similarity judgements. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[7]  T. Whitfield,et al.  Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour , 1983 .

[8]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[9]  C. Martindale,et al.  Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. , 1990 .

[10]  P. V. Wieringen,et al.  Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings , 1990 .

[11]  Patricia Anne Kimle,et al.  Fashion Advertisements: A Comparison of Viewers' Perceptual and Affective Responses to Illustrated and Photographed Stimuli , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  Deborah F. Goodman,et al.  A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. , 1995 .

[13]  Andrew L. Mendelson.  Effects of Novelty in News Photographs on Attention and Memory , 2001 .

[14]  A. Farkas.  Prototypicality-Effect in Surrealist Paintings , 2002 .

[15]  G. Rhodes,et al.  It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[17]  A. Stamps.  Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis , 2004 .

[18]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[19]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Importance of Facial Physical Attractiveness of Audiovisual Models in Descriptions and Preferences of Children and Adolescents , 2005, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  P. Silvia.  Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion , 2005 .