Using Learning Decomposition and Bootstrapping with Randomization to Compare the Impact of Different Educational Interventions on Learning

A basic question of instructional interventions is how effective it is in promoting student learning. This paper presents a study to determine the relative efficacy of different instructional strategies by applying an educational data mining technique, learning decomposition. We use logistic regression to determine how much learning is caused by different methods of teaching the same skill, relative to each other. We compare our results with a previous study, which used classical analysis techniques and reported no main effect. Our results show that there is a marginal difference, suggesting giving students scaffolding questions is less effective at promoting student learning than providing them delayed feedback. Our study utilizes learning decomposition, an easier and quicker approach of evaluating the quality of ITS interventions than experimental studies. We also demonstrate the usage of computer-intensive approach, bootstrapping, for hypothesis testing in educational data mining area.

[1]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[2]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  On Using Learning Curves to Evaluate ITS , 2005, AIED.

[3]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Comparing Worked Examples and Tutored Problem Solving: Pure vs. Mixed Approaches - eScholarship , 2010 .

[4]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[5]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[6]  Xiaonan ZHANG,et al.  All in the ( word ) family : Using learning decomposition to estimate transfer between skills in a Reading Tutor that listens , 2007 .

[7]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Using Learning Decomposition to Analyze Instructional Effectiveness in the ASSISTment System , 2009, AIED.

[8]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Does Learner Control Affect Learning? , 2007, AIED.

[9]  E. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests (3rd ed.) , 1998 .

[10]  Jack Mostow,et al.  How Who Should Practice: Using Learning Decomposition to Evaluate the Efficacy of Different Types of Practice for Different Types of Students , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  What Level of Tutor Interaction is Best? , 2007, AIED.

[12]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Tutored Problem Solving vs. “Pure” Worked Examples , 2009 .

[13]  Judy Kay,et al.  Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Artificial intelligence in education , 2011 .

[14]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Using learning decomposition to analyze student fluency development , 2005 .

[15]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Distinguishing Qualitatively Different Kinds of Learning Using Log Files and Learning Curves , 2005 .

[16]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Recasting the feedback debate: benefits of tutoring error detection and correction skills , 2003 .

[17]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[18]  Judy Kay,et al.  Artificial intelligence in education : shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies , 2003 .