Operators' Improvisation in Complex Technological Systems: Successfully Tackling Ambiguity, Enhancing Resiliency and the Last Resort to Averting Disaster

Complex safety‐critical technological systems breakdowns, which are often characterized as ‘low probability, high consequence’, could pose serious threats for workers, the local public, and possibly neighboring regions and the whole country. System designers can neither anticipate all possible scenarios nor foresee all aspects of unfolding emergency. Front‐line operators’ improvisation via dynamic problem solving and reconfiguration of available recourses provide the last resort for preventing a total system failure. Despite advances in automation, operators should remain in charge of controlling and monitoring of safety‐critical systems. Furthermore, at the time of a major emergency, operators will always constitute the society's both the first and last layer of defense; and it is eventually their improvisation and ingenuity that could save the day.

[1]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Improvisation: theory, measures and known influencing factors , 2013 .

[2]  K. Weick,et al.  Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Impromaps: applying Rasmussen's Risk Management Framework to improvisation incidents , 2014 .

[4]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  The High Reliability Organization Perspective , 2010 .

[5]  David D. Woods,et al.  Commentary: Cognitive Engineering in Complex and Dynamic Worlds , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  A performance indicator of the effectiveness of human-machine interfaces for nuclear power plants , 1993 .

[8]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Najmedin Meshkati,et al.  Integration of workstation, job, and team structure design in complex human-machine systems: A framework , 1991 .

[10]  P. Ahmed Culture and climate for innovation , 1998 .

[11]  Ann Britt Skjerve,et al.  increasing resilience by organising for successful improvisation , 2008 .

[12]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[13]  James Reason,et al.  Cognitive Aids in Process Environments: Prostheses or Tools? , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..