Emergence of biotechnology clusters: How prior structure affects formation of technology connections in Boston and San Diego from 1979 to 2006☆☆☆

Abstract We explore the network structure of technology in biotechnology industrial clusters and how prior structure affects formation of ties among technologies from a network perspective. We select Boston and San Diego as cases. Based on visualization techniques of networks, we find both clusters have a separate components structure pattern. We also observe a phenomenon of boom and decline of technologies during the evolution process. We use network degree and Pagerank algorithm to measure the importance of patents (technologies as sources), betweenness centrality, and structural holes to measure the ability of technology diffusion (technologies as conduits) in prior structure. Networks of technology connections are indicated by medical patent citations in Boston and San Diego from 1976 to 2006. We find that core position of global network has a positive relation with formation of ties. Effects of bridge position are different in two clusters.

[1]  Peter Grindrod,et al.  Models for evolving networks: with applications in telecommunication and online activities , 2012 .

[2]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[3]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[4]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  The Competencies of Regions – Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology , 2001 .

[5]  P. Krugman.  Increasing Returns and Economic Geography , 1991 .

[6]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[7]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  M. Fritsch,et al.  The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks , 2010 .

[10]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[11]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[12]  Kuei-Kuei Lai,et al.  Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network , 2009 .

[13]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Innovator networks and regional knowledge base , 2008 .

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Steven Casper,et al.  How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster , 2007 .

[16]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[17]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[18]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[19]  B. Dousset.  Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry , 2005 .

[20]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[21]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Small worlds evolving: governance reforms, privatizations, and ownership networks in Italy , 2006 .

[22]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[23]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[24]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[25]  Lorenzo Cassi,et al.  The Evolution of Trade and Scientific Collaboration Networks in the Global Wine Sector: A Longitudinal Study Using Network Analysis , 2012 .

[26]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Role of Small Firms in U.S. Biotechnology Clusters , 2001 .

[27]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[28]  Michael Gilding,et al.  'The tyranny of distance': Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes , 2008 .

[29]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile , 2013 .

[30]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Complex landscapes in economic geography , 1994 .

[31]  Michael Porter,et al.  The Economic Performance of Regions , 2003 .

[32]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Co-evolution of Firms, Industries and Networks in Space , 2011 .

[33]  Johannes Glückler.  Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks , 2007 .

[34]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector , 2004 .

[35]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Moving or doing? Knowledge flow, problem solving, and change in industrial networks , 2007 .

[36]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The Evolution of Interfirm Networks: Environmental Effects on Patterns of Network Change , 2006 .

[37]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[38]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The (Failed) Development of a Biotechnology Cluster: The Case of Lombardy , 2001 .

[39]  Robert Huggins,et al.  Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size , 2010 .

[40]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[41]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[42]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[43]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis , 2005 .

[44]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm's debt performance , 2002 .

[45]  Giacomo Becattini,et al.  The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion , 2017 .

[46]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[47]  Wai-sum Siu,et al.  Network Strategies of Small Chinese High-Technology Firms: A Qualitative Study , 2007 .

[48]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[49]  P. Swann,et al.  A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology , 1996 .

[50]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth , 2013 .

[51]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[52]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries , 2009 .