The online framing effect: the moderating role of warning, brand familiarity, and product type

This study examines the framing effect on online consumer purchase intention. Three framing effect moderators—warning type (text-based/picture-based), brand familiarity (familiar/unfamiliar), and product type (utilitarian/hedonic)—were considered. The results demonstrated that a positive frame message could create more favorable preferences toward the product than a negative frame message could. Further, consumers with text-based warnings who received positive framing messages had higher purchase intentions toward the target product than did those receiving negative framing messages. However, the online framing effect was not significant for consumers receiving picture-based warnings. Moreover, the online framing effect was significant for consumers familiar with the brand. Finally, positive messages resulted in higher purchase intention for hedonic rather than utilitarian products. This study further examined gender differences in framing effects and found women exhibited greater framing effects than men under the negative frame. The findings provide guidance for designing appropriate product strategy to induce online consumer purchase intentions that favor online retailers.

[1]  Martin Crowder,et al.  Beta-binomial Anova for Proportions , 1978 .

[2]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[3]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[4]  P. Miller,et al.  The Effect of Framing on Choice , 1990 .

[5]  Sang Pil Han,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[6]  David Arnott,et al.  Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Russell L. Kolts,et al.  Seizure Incidence in Psychopharmacological Clinical Trials: An Analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Summary Basis of Approval Reports , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[8]  Frank Ulbrich,et al.  Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res..

[9]  Jin Baek Kim,et al.  An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: integrating initial trust and TAM , 2012, Electronic Commerce Research.

[10]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Promoting Interactive Decision Aids on Retail Websites: A Message Framing Perspective with New versus Traditional Focal Actions , 2012 .

[11]  Joey F. George,et al.  Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Konstantinos C. Fragkos,et al.  Critical review of the e-loyalty literature: a purchase-centred framework , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res..

[13]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions , 2011 .

[14]  Insu Park,et al.  Assurance Seals, On-Line Customer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[15]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[18]  I. Levin,et al.  A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects , 2002 .

[19]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  I knew it all along: or, did I? , 1981 .

[20]  X. T. Wang,et al.  Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. , 2001 .

[21]  Winston R. Sieck,et al.  Exposition Effects on Decision Making: Choice and Confidence in Choice , 1997 .

[22]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  EFFECTS OF DESIGN FACTORS ON STORE IMAGE AND EXPECTATION OF MERCHANDISE QUALITY IN WEB-BASED STORES , 2008 .

[23]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[24]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[25]  A. Ant Ozok,et al.  An empirical comparison of consumer usability preferences in online shopping using stationary and mobile devices: results from a college student population , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res..

[26]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[27]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects , 1996 .

[28]  Doreen Reifegerste,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Support Healthy Settings: An Experimental Study in Preschool and the Workplace , 2015 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[30]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[31]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  Debiasing the Outcome Effect: The Role of Instructions in an Audit Litigation Setting , 2002 .

[32]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Hedonic shopping motivations , 2003 .

[33]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  The Role of Brand Familiarity on the Impact of Word-Of-Mouth Communication on Brand Evaluations , 1999 .

[34]  Manisha Singal,et al.  The effects of customers’ perceptions of brand personality in casual theme restaurants , 2011 .

[35]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Price-Framing Effects on the Purchase of Hedonic and Utilitarian Bundles , 2010 .

[36]  Walter A. Woods,et al.  Psychological Dimensions of Consumer Decision , 1960 .

[37]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  Narrowing gender-based performance gaps in virtual environment navigation , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[40]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment , 2004 .

[41]  Fei-Fei Cheng,et al.  Debiasing the framing effect: The effect of warning and involvement , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived Informativeness of Facts. , 1977 .

[43]  Dipayan Biswas,et al.  Consumer choices under product option framing: Loss aversion principles or sensitivity to price differentials? , 2008 .

[44]  S. Sen,et al.  Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web , 2007 .

[45]  Jane L. Reimers,et al.  The effect of outcome knowledge on auditors' judgmental evaluations , 1992 .

[46]  P. Nelson.  Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[47]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The impact of task framing and viewing timing on user website perceptions and viewing behavior , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects , 2003 .

[49]  Yi-Fen Chen,et al.  We‐commerce: Exploring factors influencing online group‐buying intention in Taiwan from a conformity perspective , 2015 .

[50]  I. Simonson,et al.  Attribute–Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals: , 1997 .

[51]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring-and-adjustment hypothesis , 1991 .

[52]  Nigel Kenneth Pope,et al.  The impact of sport sponsorship activities, Corporate image and prior use on a consumer purchase Intent , 2000 .

[53]  Karine Gallopel-Morvan,et al.  The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco , 2011 .

[54]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[55]  Marios D. Sotiriadis,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: the use of twitter by tourists , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res..

[56]  K M Cummings,et al.  Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[57]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[58]  Kai Wang,et al.  Influence of Web Advertising Strategies, Consumer Goal-Directedness, and Consumer Involvement on Web Advertising Effectiveness , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[59]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[60]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .

[61]  Swee Hoon Ang,et al.  Hedonic vs. utilitarian consumption: A cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning , 2008 .

[62]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[63]  Wen-Bin Chiou,et al.  EFFECTS OF HEALTH-RELATED CLAIMS ON THE DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD OF CONSUMERS' SWEETNESS SENSATION , 2009 .

[64]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[65]  M. Laroche,et al.  Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context , 1996 .

[66]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Speculations on the Future of Advertising Research , 1992 .

[67]  Geoffrey Jalleh,et al.  Positively versus negatively framed product attributes: The influence of involvement , 1999 .

[68]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[69]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  The impact of customer interface quality, satisfaction and switching costs on e-loyalty: Internet experience as a moderator , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[71]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer , 2000 .

[72]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  Framing Effects and Arenas of Choice: Your Money or Your Life? , 1997 .

[73]  Changxia Ke,et al.  Discounts and Consumer Search Behavior: The Role of Framing , 2011 .

[74]  K. T. Lacher,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Music As a Product , 1989 .

[75]  David Hammond,et al.  The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[76]  Caleb A. Cox,et al.  Decomposing the effects of negative framing in linear public goods games , 2015 .

[77]  R. Mclean,et al.  Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design : a potentially confusing task , 1975 .