An Ecological Footprint Approach to External Debt Relief

Abstract This paper applies Martinez-Alier’s [Environ. Values 2 (1993) 97] “ecological debt” concept to the problem of debt relief, exploring the possibility of compensatory transfers from rich to poor countries based on existing ecological balances. I employ recent estimates on ecological footprints and ecosystem values to estimate the ecological debt to be distributed among eligible transfer recipients––all less-developed countries (LDCs). The results provide a policy criterion for transfers in the event that future circumstances make large-scale international debt relief compulsory. The study probably underestimates the appropriate transfer amounts because of conservative assumptions regarding the environmental values and the size of the north’s ecological debt in physical terms.

[1]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .

[2]  Raymond L. Bryant,et al.  Political ecology: An emerging research agenda in Third-World studies , 1992 .

[3]  P. Daniels,et al.  Ecological restructuring for sustainable development: evidence from the Australian economy , 1999 .

[4]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  Next, the value of God, and other reactions , 1998 .

[5]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[6]  P. Ekins.  Trading with the Environment: Ecology, Economics, Institutions and Policy - Andersson, T., Folke, C. & Nyström, S. 1995, Earthscan, London (Review) , 1996 .

[7]  Christopher S. Boerner,et al.  Environmental Inequity: Economic Causes, Economic Solutions , 1997 .

[8]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Controlling the Greenhouse Effect: Five Global Regimes Compared , 1990 .

[9]  R. Repetto,et al.  Wasting Assets: Natural Resources in the National Income Accounts , 1989 .

[10]  R. Repetto,et al.  Accounts Overdue: Natural Resource Depreciation in Costa Rica , 1991 .

[11]  Distributional Issues in Ecological Economics , 1995 .

[12]  D. Helm.  Economic policy towards the environment. , 1991 .

[13]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[14]  S. Narain,et al.  Global warming in an unequal world : a case of environmental colonialism , 1991 .

[15]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Divergence, big time , 1997 .

[16]  R. Deacon,et al.  The Structure of an Environmental Transaction: The Debt-for-Nature Swap , 1997 .

[17]  B. Millikan.  Tropical Deforestation, Land Degradation, and Society , 1992 .

[18]  Peter D. Little,et al.  Lands At Risk In The Third World: Local-level Perspectives , 1987 .

[19]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Trade and the environment: from a ‘Southern’ perspective , 2001 .

[20]  B. Solomon.  New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics , 1999 .

[21]  J. Stiglitz.  Reflections on the Natural Rate Hypothesis , 1997 .

[22]  J. Martínez-Alier.  Distributional Obstacles to International Environmental Policy: The Failures at Rio and Prospects after Rio1 , 1993, Environmental Values.

[23]  J. van der Straaten,et al.  Economy and ecosystems in change : analytical and historical approaches , 1997 .

[24]  Thomas F. Homer-Dixon,et al.  The Ingenuity Gap: Can Poor Countries Adapt to Resource Scarcity? , 1995 .

[25]  T. Jenkins.  Democratising the global economy by ecologicalising economics: The example of global warming , 1996 .

[26]  C. Folke,et al.  Trading with the Environment: Ecology, economics, institutions and policy , 1995 .

[27]  M. Slaughter.  International Trade and Per Capita Income Convergence: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  A. Isla.  Enclosure and Micro-enterprise as Sustainable Development: The Case of the Canada/Costa Rica debt-for-nature investment , 2001 .

[29]  R. Husan,et al.  National Inequality and the Catch-Up Period: Some “Growth Alone” Scenarios , 2000 .

[30]  W. Rees.  How should a parasite value its host , 1998 .