Influence of Age, Anatomic Site and Race on Skin Roughness and Scaliness

Background: Variations in skin roughness and scaliness between age groups, anatomic sites and race have been assumed but minimally quantified. Objective: We quantitatively investigated skin roughness, scaliness and stratum corneum hydration as a function of age, anatomic site and race (white and black). Methods: Skin roughness, scaliness and stratum corneum hydration were determined in vivo by noninvasive bioengineering and image analysis techniques in 22 female subjects grouped according to age (young and aged) and race (white and black). Results: Skin roughness, scaliness and stratum corneum hydration varied significantly in different anatomic areas and age groups. There was no racial variation in skin hydration between any anatomic site, nor significant differences in roughness and scaliness between races, except for the preauricular area. Skin roughness was significantly increased in the aged, compared to the young at the preauricle, volar forearm, lower back, thigh and lower leg. Older women demonstrated significantly more scaling at the preauricle than younger women. Stratum corneum hydration correlated with scaliness. No significant correlation between stratum corneum hydration and skin roughness was observed. Conclusion: Age and anatomic site but not race demonstrated a significant influence on skin roughness and scaliness. The desquamation index appears a good indicator of the status of stratum corneum hydration.

[1]  P. Corcuff,et al.  The impact of aging on the microrelief of peri-orbital and leg skin , 1987 .

[2]  In vivo changes in the dynamic viscosity of human stratum corneum as a function of age and ambient moisture , 1985 .

[3]  M Fiedler,et al.  Texture analysis of the surface of the human skin. , 1995, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[4]  H I Maibach,et al.  Frictional properties of human skin: relation to age, sex and anatomical region, stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss , 1990, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  H. Maibach,et al.  Skin aging. Effect on transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and casual sebum content. , 1991, Archives of dermatology.

[6]  A. Kligman,et al.  Quantification of dry (xerotic) skin by image analysis of scales removed by adhesive discs (D-Squarnes) , 1993 .

[7]  H. Maibach,et al.  Racial differences in corneocytes. A comparison between black, white and oriental skin. , 1991, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[8]  H. Pinkus Anatomy of the skin. , 1954, Dermatologica.

[9]  C. Blichmann,et al.  A simple method for the study of scale pattern and effects of a moisturizer–qualitative and quantitative evaluation by D‐Squame® tape compared with parameters of epidermal hydration , 1989, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[10]  P. Thune Evaluation of the hydration and the water-holding capacity in atopic skin and so-called dry skin. , 1989, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[11]  P. Corcuff,et al.  Extension-induced changes in the microrelief of the human volar forearm: variations with age. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[12]  M. J. Grove,et al.  Optical profilometry: an objective method for quantification of facial wrinkles. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[13]  P. Corcuff,et al.  Microrelief changes in chronically sun-exposed human skin. , 1988, Photo-dermatology.

[14]  R. Potts,et al.  Stratum corneum hydration: experimental techniques and interpretations of results , 1986 .

[15]  Lévêque Jl Experimental methods for studying in vivo the aging of the skin in man , 1987 .

[16]  Analyse der Hautrauhigkeit bei Personen unterschiedlicher Altersgruppeen mit dem Visiometer: ein neuartiges EDV-gestütztes Messverfahren , 1995 .

[17]  R. Lunderstädt,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the skin's surface by means of digital signal processing , 1985 .

[18]  D. Weigand,et al.  Irritant Reaction in Negro and Caucasian Skin , 1974, Southern medical journal.

[19]  S. Bielfeldt,et al.  Comparative studies of skin roughness measurements by image analysis and several in vivo skin testing methods , 1991 .

[20]  P. Elias,et al.  Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[21]  Jean-Luc Leveque,et al.  Skin relief and aging , 1983 .

[22]  D. Weigand,et al.  Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. , 1974, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[23]  H. Maibach,et al.  Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white , 1988, Contact dermatitis.