Total Amylase Value in Drains After Gastrectomy for Predicting Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

Objective: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is defined using the ratio of the bilirubin concentration in abdominal drainage fluid to the upper normal range of serum amylase level. However, we hypothesized that the total amylase value in discharge (AVD) on POD 3 may be more sensitive for predicting grade II or higher severe POPF sPOPF, and compared the predictive power of the conventional definition of POPF and AVD for sPOPF. Methods: One hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent gastrectomy between October 2011 and February 2013 were analyzed. A drainage tube was placed in all the cases through the stump of the right gastroepiploic vein and the front of the pancreas to the back of the anastomotic site. The drainage volume and amylase concentration in the discharge were examined on POD 1, 3, and 5. AVD was calculated by multiplying the volume by the amylase concentration. Results: Eight patients (5.3%) developed sPOPF. In univariate analysis, both AVD and the amylase concentration ratio was significantly correlated with sPOPF (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). AVD on POD 3 showed the best predictive performance compared with the amylase concentration ratio on POD 3 (area under the curve 0.876 vs. 0.844). Based on the cutoff values calculated from the ROC curves, AVD was more specific than amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF (specificity: 97.6% vs. 86.0%; PPV: 62.5% vs. 23.1%). Conclusion: AVD on POD 3 is a more specific parameter than conventional amylase concentration ratio in predicting sPOPF.

[1]  E. Oren,et al.  Race/Ethnicity-, Socioeconomic Status-, and Anatomic Subsite-Specific Risks for Gastric Cancer. , 2018, Gastroenterology.

[2]  D. Gouma,et al.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After , 2017, Surgery.

[3]  Y. Ohkura,et al.  Tracing Dissectable Layers of Mesenteries Overcomes Embryologic Restrictions when Performing Infrapyloric Lymphadenectomy in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  H. Katai Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan , 2015, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[5]  C. Dejong,et al.  Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. , 2013, Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology.

[6]  Wei-Jei Lee,et al.  Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery , 2013, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[7]  Y. K. Park,et al.  Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  C. Pasquali,et al.  Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas: Preventing Severe Complications and Reducing Reoperation and Mortality Rate , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[9]  H. Katai,et al.  Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. , 2008, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[10]  C. Bassi,et al.  Amylase Value in Drains After Pancreatic Resection as Predictive Factor of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Results of a Prospective Study in 137 Patients , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[11]  H. Katai,et al.  Risk factors for pancreas-related abscess after total gastrectomy , 2005, Gastric Cancer.

[12]  M. Sasako Principles of surgical treatment for curable gastric cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  H. Friess,et al.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  M. Brennan Radical surgery for gastric cancer. A review of the Japanese experience , 1989, Cancer.

[15]  A. Cuschieri Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Definitions and objectives , 1986, The British journal of surgery.