Personal Device as a Controller for Interactive Surfaces: Usability and Utility of Different Connection Methods

The popularity of touch-screen-equipped smart phones has made them an attractive choice for interacting with large display surfaces, especially in public spaces. The challenge in using a personal mobile device for interaction in such a setting lies in the usability of methods to initiate the interaction, as the users may give up if the interaction is not immediately successful. For this reason, a few commercial systems have already opted to use web-based interaction instead of dedicated mobile applications. However, the usability of different methods of initiating the web-based interaction has not been extensively studied. In this paper we present the results of a laboratory usability study with 20 participants, in which we studied how the users experienced four different methods of initiating web-based interaction between a smart phone and a large display surface. The compared initiation methods were NFC, QR code, typing an URL and connecting to a WiFi access point. Additionally, in order to study how the users experienced the quality of the connection, the first three methods were used over 3G. Our results indicate typing an URL to be the most usable method for initiating the connection between the smart phone and the large display surface. The difference in quality between the 3G and WiFi connections was deemed hardly noticeable by the subjects. We acknowledge that our results are only preliminary, and the subject needs to be studied in a more realistic setting to get a more comprehensive picture.

[1]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  Designing for presenters at public walk-up-and-use displays , 2014, TEI '14.

[2]  Anthony Tang,et al.  Designing for bystanders: reflections on building a public digital forum , 2008, CHI.

[3]  Marko Turpeinen,et al.  From Space to Stage: How Interactive Screens Will Change Urban Life , 2011, Computer.

[4]  Tao Xu,et al.  Direct migrator: Eliminating borders between personal mobile devices and pervasive displays , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[5]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Pervasive advertising , 2009, GI Jahrestagung.

[6]  Robert Hardy,et al.  Touch & interact: touch-based interaction of mobile phones with displays , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[7]  Markus Rittenbruch Supporting Collaboration on Very Large-Scale Interactive Wall Surfaces , 2015, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Interaction techniques for creating and exchanging content with public displays , 2013, CHI.

[9]  Sonia Mendoza,et al.  Multi-user interaction with public screens using mobile devices , 2011, 2011 8th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control.

[10]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment , 2010, ITS '10.

[11]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre , 2008, CHI.

[12]  Marko Turpeinen,et al.  Spaceify: a client-edge-server ecosystem for mobile computing in smart spaces , 2013, MobiCom.

[13]  Pin-Han Ho,et al.  Smart Signage: A Draggable Cyber-Physical Broadcast/Multicast Media System , 2013, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput..

[14]  Adrian Friday,et al.  MAGIC Broker: A Middleware Toolkit for Interactive Public Displays , 2008, 2008 Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[15]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[16]  Nigel Davies,et al.  Using bluetooth device names to support interaction in smart environments , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[17]  Daniel Jackson,et al.  Smart Phone Interaction with Registered Displays , 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing.