Can small animal imaging accelerate drug development?

Better mechanistic understanding of disease through mapping of the human and mouse genomes enables rethinking of human infirmity. In the case of cancer, for example, we may begin to associate disease states with their underlying genetic defects rather than with the organ system involved. That will enable more selective, nontoxic therapies in patients who are genetically predisposed to respond to them. Because one of the major goals of molecular imaging research is to interrogate gene expression noninvasively, it can impact greatly on that process. Most of molecular imaging research is undertaken in small animals, which provide a conduit between in vitro studies and human clinical imaging. We are fortunate to be able to manipulate small animals genetically, and to have increasingly better models of human disease. The ability to study those animals noninvasively and quantitatively with new, high‐resolution imaging devices provides the most relevant milieu in which to find and examine new therapies. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 39: 211–220, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Gerhard Gründer,et al.  Time Course of 5-HT2A Receptor Occupancy in the Human Brain after a Single Oral Dose of the Putative Antipsychotic Drug MDL 100,907 Measured by Positron Emission Tomography , 1997, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[2]  N. Volkow,et al.  PET and drug research and development. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  S. Larson,et al.  Cells exposed to antifolates show increased cellular levels of proteins fused to dihydrofolate reductase: A method to modulate gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Human transferrin receptor gene as a marker gene for MR imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  Jürg Zimmermann,et al.  Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr–Abl positive cells , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[6]  Gaetano T. Montelione,et al.  Structural genomics: An approach to the protein folding problem , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  T. Jones,et al.  In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development using positron-emission tomography. , 2001, Drug discovery today.

[8]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Molecular imaging of small animals with dedicated PET tomographs , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  P. Price,et al.  PET for in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[10]  The Potential Uses of Radiopharmaceuticals in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 1993 .

[11]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. , 2000, Science.

[12]  R. Buckley Gene therapy for SCID—a complication after remarkable progress , 2002, The Lancet.

[13]  W Vaalburg,et al.  Drug development, radiolabelled drugs and PET. , 1999, Annals of medicine.

[14]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Methods to monitor response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Padhani,et al.  The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists , 2001 .

[16]  M. Pomper,et al.  Radiolabeled neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors: synthesis, in vivo evaluation, and primate PET studies. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  T. Grist,et al.  Carotid MR angiography: phase II study of safety and efficacy for MS-325. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  B. Kreider Chapter 22. Proteomics: defining protein function in the post genomics era , 2001 .

[19]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  MRI of the tumor microenvironment , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Parvaneh Saeedi,et al.  A physical map of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[21]  A R Padhani,et al.  The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  C. Contag,et al.  It's not just about anatomy: In vivo bioluminescence imaging as an eyepiece into biology , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Jeff W M Bulte,et al.  In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Tracking of Magnetically Labeled Cells after Transplantation , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[24]  R Weissleder,et al.  Improvement of MRI probes to allow efficient detection of gene expression. , 2000, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[25]  R Myers,et al.  Dedicated small animal scanners: a new tool for drug development? , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.

[26]  S. Osman,et al.  Radiolabelled tracers and anticancer drugs for assessment of therapeutic efficacy using PET. , 2001, Current pharmaceutical design.

[27]  H. Dittmann,et al.  Early changes in [18F]FLT uptake after chemotherapy: an experimental study , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  D Artemov,et al.  Vascular differences detected by MRI for metastatic versus nonmetastatic breast and prostate cancer xenografts. , 2001, Neoplasia.

[29]  J. Hietala Ligand-receptor interactions as studied by PET: implications for drug development. , 1999, Annals of medicine.

[30]  W Vaalburg,et al.  Positron emission tomography in drug development and drug evaluation. , 2000, Current pharmaceutical design.

[31]  Wei Li,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of protein–protein interactions in living animals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Weissleder Scaling down imaging: molecular mapping of cancer in mice , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.