Artificial intelligence together with mechanical imaging in mammography

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly seeing use in breast imaging, particularly to assist in or automate the reading of mammograms. Another novel technique is mechanical imaging (MI) which estimates the relative stiffness of suspicious breast abnormalities by measuring the distribution of pressure on the compressed breast. This study investigates the feasibility of combining AI and MI information in breast imaging to provide further diagnostic information. Forty-six women recalled from screening were included in the analysis. Mammograms with findings scored on a suspiciousness scale by an AI tool, and corresponding pressure distributions were collected for each woman. The cases were divided into three groups by diagnosis; biopsy-proven cancer, biopsy-proven benign and non-biopsied, very likely benign. For all three groups, the relative increase of pressure at the location of the finding marked most suspicious by the AI software was recorded. A significant correlation between the relative pressure increase at the AI finding and the AI score was established in the group with cancer (p=0.043), but neither group of healthy women showed such a correlation. This study suggests that AI and MI indicate independent markers for breast cancer. The combination of these two methods has the potential to increase the accuracy of mammography screening, but further research is needed.

[1]  Kent N Bachus,et al.  Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: using Fuji Film and TekScan systems. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  T. Helbich,et al.  Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists. , 2019, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Magnus Dustler,et al.  Pressure distribution in mammography. Mechanical imaging and implications for breast compression , 2016 .

[4]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening? , 2017, European Radiology.

[5]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[6]  X. Castells,et al.  Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in U.S., Norway, and Spain , 2015, European Radiology.

[7]  E. Krupinski,et al.  Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System. , 2019, Radiology.

[8]  S. Zackrisson,et al.  Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening , 2015, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  Armen P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Mechanical imaging: : A new technology for medical diagnostics , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Pressure distribution in mammography: compression of breasts with malignant tumor masses , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Armen P. Sarvazyan,et al.  Mechanical imaging in medical applications , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  A. Sarvazyan,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.