Comprehensive Analysis of Stroke in the Long-Term Cohort of the MOMENTUM 3 Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the HeartMate 3 Versus the HeartMate II Cardiac Pump

Background: The MOMENTUM 3 study (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3) has demonstrated that the HeartMate 3 (HM3) pump is associated with reduced strokes compared with the HeartMate II (HMII) device. We now perform a comprehensive analysis of stroke events to evaluate their longitudinal occurrence, clinical correlates, patterns, and impact on outcome across the 2-year duration of support. Methods: MOMENTUM 3 is a randomized controlled trial of the HM3 centrifugal-flow pump versus the HMII axial-flow pump in patients with advanced heart failure, regardless of the intended goal of support (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). Baseline and postimplantation clinical correlates of stroke events were assessed with multivariable analyses. Longitudinal patterns, including device association, type of stroke (hemorrhagic versus ischemic), changing severity of impairment assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (disabling [modified Rankin Scale score >3] versus nondisabling [modified Rankin Scale score ⩽3]) over time, and association with outcome, were determined. Results: In 361 patients with the intended implant (189 HM3 and 172 HMII), 65 strokes (40 ischemic strokes and 25 hemorrhagic strokes) occurred in 52 patients at a median of 131 (range, 1–733) days. No difference in stroke rate was noted between 0 and 180 days of follow-up between devices. However, stroke incidence in the long-term period (181–730 days after left ventricular assist device) was 3.3 times lower for the HM3 group (HM3: 0.04 versus HMII: 0.13 events per patient-year; odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08–0.63; P=0.01). Treatment with the HM3 pump was the only independent predictor of lower stroke events. We found no direct association of blood pressure or antithrombotic regimens with observed stroke rates. A stroke event significantly lowered 2-year postimplantation survival regardless of subtype or initial severity of neurological impairment compared with patients without a stroke (43±12% for hemorrhagic stroke, 57±9% for ischemic stroke, 51±11% for disabling, and 51±11% for nondisabling compared with 85±2% 2-year survival for patients without stroke). Conclusions: The HM3 pump is associated with a marked reduction in stroke rates compared with the HMII device, with benefits observed in the long-term period (>6 months). The occurrence of stroke of any type (hemorrhagic and ischemic) or of any functional severity (disabling and nondisabling) is predictive of a poor 2-year clinical outcome. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02224755.

[1]  J. Rogers,et al.  Risk factors for stroke on left ventricular assist devices , 2018, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[2]  M. Mehra,et al.  Evaluation of low-intensity anti-coagulation with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow circulatory pump-the MAGENTUM 1 study. , 2018, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  C. Morgan,et al.  INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Risk Factors and Outcomes. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[4]  J. Rogers,et al.  Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[5]  A. Nowacki,et al.  Risk factors, mortality, and timing of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with left ventricular assist devices. , 2017, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[6]  Koji Takeda,et al.  Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device. , 2016, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  Jan Claassen,et al.  Neuroendovascular Interventions for Acute Ischemic Strokes in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Single-Center Case Series and Review of the Literature. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[8]  J. Cleveland,et al.  Clinical trial design and rationale of the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) investigational device exemption clinical study protocol. , 2016, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[9]  G. Ewald,et al.  The HVAD Left Ventricular Assist Device: Risk Factors for Neurological Events and Risk Mitigation Strategies. , 2015, JACC. Heart failure.

[10]  Mario Zuccarello,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2015, Stroke.

[11]  J. McMurray,et al.  Risk of Stroke in Chronic Heart Failure Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin in Multinational Trial Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Insufficienza Cardiaca-Heart Failure (GISSI-HF) Trials , 2015, Circulation.

[12]  R. Lazar,et al.  Cerebrovascular disease in the era of left ventricular assist devices with continuous flow: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Energy transmission and power sources for mechanical circulatory support devices to achieve total implantability. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  O. Howard Frazier,et al.  Pre-operative risk factors of bleeding and stroke during left ventricular assist device support: an analysis of more than 900 HeartMate II outpatients. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Igor Gregoric,et al.  HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. , 2013, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  Palak Shah,et al.  Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.