On the detectability of local resampling in digital images

In Ref. 15, we took a critical view on the reliability of forensic techniques as tools to generate evidence of authenticity for digital images and presented targeted attacks against the state-of-the-art resampling detector by Popescu and Farid. We demonstrated that a correct detection of manipulations can be impeded by resampling with geometric distortion. However, we constrained our experiments to global image transformations. In a more realistic scenario, most forgeries will make use of local resampling operations, e.g., when pasting a beforehand scaled or rotated object. In this paper, we investigate the detectability of local resampling without and with geometric distortion and study the influence of the size both of the tampered and the analyzed image region. Although the detector might fail to reveal the characteristic periodic resampling artifacts, a forensic investigator can benefit from the generally increased correlation in resampled image regions. We present an adapted targeted attack, which allows for an increased degree of undetectability in the case of local resampling.

[1]  Babak Mahdian,et al.  Detection of copy-move forgery using a method based on blur moment invariants. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[2]  Babak Mahdian,et al.  On Periodic Properties of Interpolation and Their Application To Image Authentication , 2007 .

[3]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  Can we trust digital image forensics? , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[4]  Mo Chen,et al.  Imaging Sensor Noise as Digital X-Ray for Revealing Forgeries , 2007, Information Hiding.

[5]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  Tamper Hiding: Defeating Image Forensics , 2007, Information Hiding.

[6]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  A model for image splicing , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[7]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Wei Su,et al.  Image splicing detection using 2-D phase congruency and statistical moments of characteristic function , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Jessica Fridrich,et al.  Detection of Copy-Move Forgery in Digital Images , 2004 .

[10]  David Letscher,et al.  Detecting filtered cloning in digital images , 2007, MM&Sec.

[11]  Alin C. Popescu,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Hany Farid,et al.  Exposing Digital Forgeries in Complex Lighting Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[13]  Andrew C. Gallagher Detection of linear and cubic interpolation in JPEG compressed images , 2005, The 2nd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV'05).

[14]  Hany Farid,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling , 2005 .

[15]  Hany Farid,et al.  Exposing digital forgeries through chromatic aberration , 2006, MM&Sec '06.

[16]  Hany Farid,et al.  Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics , 2004, Information Hiding.

[17]  Min Wu,et al.  Image Tampering Identification using Blind Deconvolution , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  S. Prasad,et al.  On Resampling Detection and its Application to Detect Image Tampering , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[19]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation revisited [medical images application] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  George Wolberg,et al.  Digital image warping , 1990 .