Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators

This paper introduces the new theoretical concept of technology mediated trust, or in short, mediated trust to capture and analyze the role of complex techno-social assemblages in trust production and distrust management. Societies are increasingly reliant on digital technologies to collect data; sort, rank and filter users and information in order to ease communication, commerce, or collaboration. This paper considers the impact of these digital practices on the interpersonal and institutional logics of trust production. The first part of the paper argues that globalization and digitalization unleashed a trust crisis, as the traditional institutional and interpersonal logics are not attuned to produce trust and manage distrust at the scale and speed of global networks of communication, media, finance, etc. In the second part, the paper describes how digital intermediation changes the traditional logics of interpersonal trust formation, and creates new trust mediating services. It also considers how old institutional forms of trust production are affected by the fact that these institutions employ digital technologies in their processes, and describes new, technological forms of institutional trust production. Finally, the paper asks the question: why should we trust these technological trust mediators? The analysis concludes at best, it is impossible to establish the trustworthiness trust mediators, at worst, we have no reason to trust them.

[1]  H. Barger The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money , 1936, Nature.

[2]  T. Parsons The Professions and Social Structure , 1939 .

[3]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[4]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[5]  G. Simmel The Philosophy of Money , 1979 .

[6]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[7]  W. Ong,et al.  Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word , 1984 .

[8]  L. Zucker Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[9]  S. Shapiro The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[11]  Anthony Debons,et al.  The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[13]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[14]  W. Boyd,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity@@@Risk and Rationality: Philosophical; Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1993 .

[15]  G. Gereffi,et al.  Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism , 1994 .

[16]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[17]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[18]  Kevin Quigley Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity , 1996 .

[19]  B. Misztal Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order , 1996 .

[20]  R. Barbrook,et al.  The Californian ideology , 1996 .

[21]  W. Williams Why people don't trust government , 1998 .

[22]  R. Inglehart Democracy and Trust: Trust, well-being and democracy , 1999 .

[23]  N. Luhmann Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives , 2000 .

[24]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[25]  P. Sztompka Trust: A Sociological Theory , 2000 .

[26]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Trust and reciprocity : interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research , 2003 .

[28]  Sotirios Terzis,et al.  Trust Management , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[29]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Trust, Contract and Relationship Development , 2005 .

[30]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Trust, Untrust, Distrust and Mistrust - An Exploration of the Dark(er) Side , 2005, iTrust.

[31]  Alejandro Moreno,et al.  The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies , 2006 .

[32]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Trust in Technology: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[33]  M. Rouncefield,et al.  Trust in Technology: A Socio-Technical Perspective (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) , 2006 .

[34]  Tarleton Gillespie,et al.  The politics of ‘platforms’ , 2010, New Media Soc..

[35]  John Allspaw,et al.  How Complex Systems Fail , 2010, Web Operations.

[36]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures , 2011, TMIS.

[37]  Coye Cheshire Online Trust, Trustworthiness, or Assurance? , 2011, Daedalus.

[38]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[39]  B. Schneier Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust that Society Needs to Thrive , 2012 .

[40]  S. Huntington,et al.  The Crisis of Democracy. Report on the Governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission , 2012 .

[41]  Evgeny Morozov,et al.  Book review: To save everything click here: the folly of technological solutionism , 2013 .

[42]  V. V.j. The Proposed Right to be Forgotten Seen from the Perspective of Our Right to Remember Freedom of Expression Safeguards in a Converging Information Environment , 2013 .

[43]  Rodney Harrison,et al.  The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world , 2013 .

[44]  Cameron Tonkinwise,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism , 2014 .

[45]  Scott J. Shackelford,et al.  Toward a Global Cybersecurity Standard of Care? Exploring the Implications of the 2014 NIST Cybersecurity Framework on Shaping Reasonable National and International Cybersecurity Practices , 2014 .

[46]  Frank A. Pasquale The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .

[47]  H. Nissenbaum Securing Trust Online: Wisdom or Oxymoron? , 2015 .

[48]  Huan Liu,et al.  Trust in Social Media , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, & Trust.

[49]  Fabian Sander The global transformation: history, modernity and the making of international relations , 2015 .

[50]  Michael Frueh,et al.  The Problem Of Trust , 2016 .

[51]  Esther Keymolen Trust on the Line: A Philosophical Exploration of Trust in the Networked Era , 2016 .

[52]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Péter Csigó The Neopopular Bubble , 2016 .

[54]  Mareike Möhlmann Digital Trust and Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Consumption Platforms: A Mediation Analysis , 2016 .

[55]  Seda Gürses,et al.  Privacy after the Agile Turn , 2016 .

[56]  Bruno Moriset,et al.  The Reputation Economy: Understanding Knowledge Work in Digital Society , 2017 .

[57]  A. Hurrell The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Barry Buzan and George Lawson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 421 pp., $29.99 paper, $98 cloth. , 2017, Ethics & International Affairs.

[58]  Rachel Botsman Who Can You Trust?: How Technology Brought Us Together and Why It Might Drive Us Apart , 2017 .

[59]  Quinn DuPont Experiments in algorithmic governance : A history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization , 2017 .

[60]  Josh Lauer Creditworthy: A History of Consumer Surveillance and Financial Identity in America , 2017 .

[61]  Kate Klonick,et al.  The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech , 2017 .

[62]  Christian Sandvig,et al.  Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook , 2018, New Media Soc..

[63]  Balázs Bodó,et al.  Tackling the Algorithmic Control Crisis – the Technical, Legal, and Ethical Challenges of Research into Algorithmic Agents , 2018 .

[64]  Nicolas Suzor,et al.  Lawless: the secret rules that govern our digital lives , 2018 .

[65]  Virginia E. Eubanks Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018 .

[66]  F. Zuiderveen Borgesius,et al.  Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making , 2018 .

[67]  K. Ramphul,et al.  Is "Snapchat Dysmorphia" a Real Issue? , 2018, Cureus.

[68]  Vladan Joler Anatomy of an AI System The Amazon Echo as an anatomical map of human labor , data and planetary resources , 2018 .

[69]  Suyoto,et al.  Fraud Crime Mitigation of Mobile Application Users for Online Transportation , 2018, Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol..

[70]  K. Werbach The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust , 2018 .

[71]  Ö. Özer,et al.  Trust and Trustworthiness , 2017, The Handbook of Behavioral Operations.

[72]  N. Helberger On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders , 2019, Algorithms, Automation, and News.

[73]  T. Braver,et al.  Editorial , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[74]  J. Dijck,et al.  Reframing platform power , 2019, Internet Policy Rev..

[75]  K. Yeung Regulation by Blockchain: The Emerging Battle for Supremacy between the Code of Law and Code as Law , 2019, The Modern Law Review.

[76]  Balázs Bodó,et al.  The Logics of Technology Decentralization - The Case of Distributed Ledger Technologies , 2019, Blockchain and Web 3.0.

[77]  Balázs Bodó Selling News to Audiences – A Qualitative Inquiry into the Emerging Logics of Algorithmic News Personalization in European Quality News Media , 2019, Algorithms, Automation, and News.

[78]  Nicole P. Marwell Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. By Virginia Eubanks. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2017. Pp. 272. $26.99 (cloth). , 2020 .

[79]  T. Porter,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 2020 .

[80]  The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2020 .

[81]  Timm Teubner,et al.  Reputation portability – quo vadis? , 2019, Electronic Markets.