Modeling Multi-Modal Morning Commute in a One-to-One Corridor Network

Abstract In this paper, we study the morning commute problem with three modes: transit, driving alone and carpool. The transit mode uses its own separate guideway, but the auto modes can access two parallel routes to reach the destination – a freeway and an arterial road (AR). Carpoolers are assumed to share their fuel costs and road tolls, in addition to their advantage of using specially provided facilities (HOV lanes). However, there is an added cost of carpooling: the cost associated with pick-up and drop-off. We analyze the interactions among the three modes and how different factors affect their mode shares and network performance. This is achieved by first deriving the departure time equilibrium for the transit mode (in the same fashion as is done for the auto modes), then establishing equilibrium within each mode. The shares among the modes are determined by a nested logit model. Finally, a time-varying toll on the freeway is proposed to completely eliminate the congestion on the freeway. Some intriguing findings of this study include: (1) enlarging HOV facilities, which offers a travel advantage for carpoolers over solo-drivers, may reduce transit ridership and increase auto travel, and it does not necessarily reduce the total travel cost on the network when the network is highly congested; (2) the rise of gas price may first entice auto commuters to carpool. However, as the gas price increases further, both carpoolers and solo-drivers will eventually switch to use the transit mode; and (3) a flat freeway toll can also reduce the total network travel cost.

[1]  Xeuhao Chu,et al.  Endogenous Trip Scheduling: The Henderson Approach Reformulated and Compared with the Vickrey Approach , 1993 .

[2]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A Pareto Improving Strategy for the Time-Dependent Morning Commute Problem , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[3]  Takatoshi Tabuchi,et al.  Bottleneck Congestion and Modal Split , 1993 .

[4]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  USING CHOICE SETS FOR ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION IN ROUTE CHOICE , 2008 .

[5]  Hai Yang,et al.  CARPOOLING AND PRICING IN A MULTILANE HIGHWAY WITH HIGH-OCCUPANCY-VEHICLE LANES AND BOTTLENECK CONGESTION , 1999 .

[6]  A. Palma,et al.  SCHEDULE DELAY AND DEPARTURE TIME DECISIONS WITH HETEROGENEOUS COMMUTERS , 1988 .

[7]  Joy Dahlgren,et al.  High-occupancy/toll lanes: where should they be implemented? , 2002 .

[8]  Masao Kuwahara Equilibrium Queueing Patterns at a Two-Tandem Bottleneck during the Morning Peak , 1990, Transp. Sci..

[9]  André de Palma,et al.  Properties of Dynamic Traffic Equilibrium Involving Bottlenecks, Including a Paradox and Metering , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[10]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  STOCHASTIC ROUTE CHOICE SET GENERATION: BEHAVIORAL AND PROBABILISTIC FOUNDATIONS , 2007 .

[11]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  Pricing and logit-based mode choice models of a transit and highway system with elastic demand , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Dynamic User Equilibrium Departure Time and Route Choice on Idealized Traffic Arterials , 1984, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: the case with two groups of commuters , 2000 .

[14]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[15]  Robin Lindsey,et al.  DEPARTURE TIME AND ROUTE CHOICE FOR THE MORNING COMMUTE , 1990 .

[16]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Effects of HOV lanes on freeway bottlenecks , 2007 .

[17]  Marvin Kraus,et al.  When are Anonymous Congestion Charges Consistent with Marginal Cost Pricing? , 1994 .

[18]  Rob van Nes,et al.  Multimodal traveling and its impact on urban transit network design , 2004 .

[19]  Hai Yang,et al.  Optimal utilization of a transport system with auto/transit parallel modes , 1999 .