On the mechanism of FtsH‐dependent degradation of the σ32 transcriptional regulator of Escherichia coli and the role of the DnaK chaperone machine

The Escherichia coliσ32 transcriptional regulator has been shown to be degraded both in vivo and in vitro by the FtsH (HflB) protease, a member of the AAA protein family. In our attempts to study this process in detail, we found that two σ32 mutants lacking 15–20 C‐terminal amino acids had substantially increased half‐lives in vivo or in vitro, compared with wild‐type σ32. A truncated version of σ32, σ32CΔ, was purified to homogeneity and shown to be resistant to FtsH‐dependent degradation in vitro, suggesting that FtsH initiates σ32 degradation from its extreme C‐terminal region. Purified σ32CΔ interacted with the DnaK and DnaJ chaperone proteins in a fashion similar to that of wild‐type σ32. However, in contrast to wild‐type σ32, σ32CΔ was largely deficient in its in vivo and in vitro interaction with core RNA polymerase. As a consequence, the truncated σ32 protein was completely non‐functional in vivo, even when overproduced. Furthermore, it is shown that wild‐type σ32 is protected from degradation by FtsH when complexed to the RNA polymerase core, but sensitive to proteolysis when in complex with the DnaK chaperone machine. Our results are in agreement with the proposal that the capacity of the DnaK chaperone machine to autoregulate its own synthesis negatively is simply the result of its ability to sequester σ32 from RNA polymerase, thus making it accessible to degradation by the FtsH protease.

[1]  C. Gross,et al.  Escherichia coli heat shock gene mutants are defective in proteolysis. , 1988, Genes & development.

[2]  P. Christen,et al.  The power stroke of the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE molecular chaperone system. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  P. Bouloc,et al.  The HflB protease of Escherichia coli degrades its inhibitor lambda cIII , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  C. Gross,et al.  Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli mutants that lack the heat shock sigma factor sigma 32 , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  P. Bouloc,et al.  Degradation of sigma 32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  9 Properties of the Heat Shock Proteins of Escherichia coli and the Autoregulation of the Heat Shock Response , 1994 .

[7]  M. Żylicz,et al.  Divergent Effects of ATP on the Binding of the DnaK and DnaJ Chaperones to Each Other, or to Their Various Native and Denatured Protein Substrates (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  T. Galitski,et al.  The DnaK chaperone modulates the heat shock response of Escherichia coli by binding to the sigma 32 transcription factor. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Koreaki Ito,et al.  FtsH is required for proteolytic elimination of uncomplexed forms of SecY, an essential protein translocase subunit. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Both ambient temperature and the DnaK chaperone machine modulate the heat shock response in Escherichia coli by regulating the switch between sigma 70 and sigma 32 factors assembled with RNA polymerase. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[11]  M. Żylicz,et al.  Real Time Kinetics of the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE Molecular Chaperone Machine Action (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  M. Gribskov,et al.  The sigma 70 family: sequence conservation and evolutionary relationships , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  R. Sauer,et al.  Tsp: a tail-specific protease that selectively degrades proteins with nonpolar C termini. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Involvement of the chaperonin dnaK in the rapid degradation of a mutant protein in Escherichia coli. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[15]  K. Ito,et al.  FtsH, a Membrane-bound ATPase, Forms a Complex in the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Escherichia coli(*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Monomerization of RepA dimers by heat shock proteins activates binding to DNA replication origin. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli heat shock response by the DnaK and DnaJ heat shock proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  E. Craig,et al.  Major heat shock gene of Drosophila and the Escherichia coli heat-inducible dnaK gene are homologous. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  C. Gross,et al.  DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE heat shock proteins negatively regulate heat shock gene expression by controlling the synthesis and stability of sigma 32. , 1990, Genes & development.

[20]  H. Bujard,et al.  A cycle of binding and release of the DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE chaperones regulates activity of the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor sigma32. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[21]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Modulation of stability of the Escherichia coli heat shock regulatory factor sigma , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  S. Morimura,et al.  The Escherichia coli FtsH protein is a prokaryotic member of a protein family of putative ATPases involved in membrane functions, cell cycle control, and gene expression , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  H. Mori,et al.  Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane‐bound, ATP‐dependent protease which degrades the heat‐shock transcription factor sigma 32. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[24]  C. Gross,et al.  8 The Function and Regulation of Heat Shock Proteins in Escherichia coli , 1990 .

[25]  F. Hartl,et al.  Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding , 1992, Nature.

[26]  Koreaki Ito,et al.  A protease complex in the Escherichia coli plasma membrane: HflKC (HflA) forms a complex with FtsH (HflB), regulating its proteolytic activity against SecY. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[27]  F. Confalonieri,et al.  A 200‐amino acid ATPase module in search of a basic function , 1995, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[28]  M. Żylicz,et al.  Calf Thymus Hsc70 Protein Protects and Reactivates Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Enzymes (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  C. Georgopoulos Bacterial mutants in which the gene N function of bacteriophage lambda is blocked have an altered RNA polymerase. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  P. Bouloc,et al.  Degradation of carboxy-terminal-tagged cytoplasmic proteins by the Escherichia coli protease HflB (FtsH). , 1998, Genes & development.

[31]  M. Humphries,et al.  Regulation of integrin alpha 5 beta 1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. Evidence for distinct classes of binding sites for Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+. , 1995, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  H. Krisch,et al.  In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. , 1984, Gene.

[33]  H. Mori,et al.  Regulation of the heat-shock response in bacteria. , 1993, Annual review of microbiology.

[34]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  ATP Hydrolysis Is Required for the DnaJ-dependent Activation of DnaK Chaperone for Binding to Both Native and Denatured Protein Substrates (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  C. Gross,et al.  The activity of sigma 32 is reduced under conditions of excess heat shock protein production in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Genes & development.

[36]  B. Bukau Regulation of the Escherichia coli heat‐shock response , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[37]  F. Hartl,et al.  The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Kumar,et al.  The minus 35-recognition region of Escherichia coli sigma 70 is inessential for initiation of transcription at an "extended minus 10" promoter. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  The Hsp70 and Hsp60 Chaperone Machines , 1998, Cell.

[40]  R. Calendar,et al.  A sigma32 mutant with a single amino acid change in the highly conserved region 2.2 exhibits reduced core RNA polymerase affinity. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  G. Zubay The isolation and properties of CAP, the catabolite gene activator. , 1980, Methods in enzymology.

[42]  A. Kato,et al.  Topology and subcellular localization of FtsH protein in Escherichia coli , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[43]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Initiation of lambda DNA replication with purified host‐ and bacteriophage‐encoded proteins: the role of the dnaK, dnaJ and grpE heat shock proteins. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[44]  R. Burgess,et al.  A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[45]  H. Yanagi,et al.  Synergistic roles of HslVU and other ATP-dependent proteases in controlling in vivo turnover of sigma32 and abnormal proteins in Escherichia coli , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  C. Alfano,et al.  Reconstitution of a nine-protein system that initiates bacteriophage λ DNA replication , 1989 .

[47]  D. Jin,et al.  Multiple Regions on the Escherichia coliHeat Shock Transcription Factor ς32 Determine Core RNA Polymerase Binding Specificity , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[48]  F. Hartl,et al.  DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE form a cellular chaperone machinery capable of repairing heat‐induced protein damage. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[49]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Both the Escherichia coli chaperone systems, GroEL/GroES and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, can reactivate heat-treated RNA polymerase. Different mechanisms for the same activity. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The E. coli dnaK gene product, the hsp70 homolog, can reactivate heat-inactivated RNA polymerase in an ATP hydrolysis-dependent manner , 1990, Cell.

[51]  H. Bujard,et al.  Physical interaction between heat shock proteins DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE and the bacterial heat shock transcription factor σ 32 , 1992, Cell.

[52]  M. Kessel,et al.  Proteolysis of the phage λ CII regulatory protein by FtsH (HflB) of Escherichia coli , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[53]  C. R. Fuerst,et al.  Involvement of the htpR gene product of Escherichia coli in phage λ development , 1985 .

[54]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Role of the Heat Shock Protein DnaJ in the Lon-dependent Degradation of Naturally Unstable Proteins* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  T. Yura,et al.  A distinct segment of the sigma 32 polypeptide is involved in DnaK-mediated negative control of the heat shock response in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.