Random field models in the textural analysis of ultrasonic images of the liver

Conventional two-dimensional (2-D) texture parameters serve as the "gold standard" of texture analysis. The authors compared a new stochastic model, based on autoregressive periodic random field models (APRFM) with conventional texture analysts (CTA) parameter, which were defined as measures of the co-occurrence matrix, i.e., entropy, contrast, correlation, uniformity, and maximum frequency. By fitting the model to a given texture pattern, the estimated model parameters are suitable texture features. In 81 patients, divided into patients without (N=19) and with (N=62) microfocal lesions of the liver, a set of 24 CTA and 16 APRFM parameters were calculated from ultrasonic liver images. To ensure simple computation the APRFM parameters were based on the unilateral type of pixel neighborhood. Regenerated texture by APRFM was visually comparable with the original texture. Reclassification analysis using the classification and regression tree (CART) discriminant analysis system and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the texture classification potency of APRFM- and CTA-parameters. Discriminating between liver with and without microfocal lesions, the best results were seen for the APRFM parameter.

[1]  John W. Woods,et al.  Two-dimensional discrete Markovian fields , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Characterization and estimation of two-dimensional ARMA models , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Syntactic image modeling using stochastic tree grammars , 1980 .

[4]  C R Hill,et al.  Tissue characterization from ultrasound B-scan data. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  F. G. Sommer,et al.  Ultrasonic Characterization of Tissue Structure in the In Vivo Human Liver and Spleen , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[6]  M. Fox,et al.  Fractal feature analysis and classification in medical imaging. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  B. J. Oosterveld,et al.  A Simulation Study of Structural Scattering in Ultrasonic B-Mode Imaging , 1992 .

[8]  J. Thijssen,et al.  Correlations between acoustic and texture parameters from RF and B-mode liver echograms. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Ulrich Ranft Texture Analysis using Random Field Models exemplified on Ultrasonic Images of the Liver , 1987 .

[10]  Siegfried Wagner,et al.  Tissue characterization using intelligent adaptive filter in the diagnosis of diffuse and focal liver disease , 1994 .

[11]  Béla Julesz,et al.  Visual Pattern Discrimination , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  D. T. Morris,et al.  An evaluation of the use of texture measurements for the tissue characterisation of ultrasonic images of in vivo human placentae. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Estimation and choice of neighbors in spatial-interaction models of images , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  A Lorenz,et al.  Echographic Tissue Characterization in Diffuse Parenchymal Liver Disease: Correlation of Image Structure with Histology , 1990, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Texture classification using features derived from random field models , 1982, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  P. Moran Necessary conditions for Markovian processes on a lattice , 1973, Journal of Applied Probability.

[18]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[19]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computerized B‐scan texture analysis and conventional ultrasonography in diffuse parenchymal and malignant liver disease , 1985, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[20]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.