Validation of driving behaviour as a step towards the investigation of Connected and Automated Vehicles by means of driving simulators

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) are likely to become an integral part of the traffic stream within the next few years. Their presence is expected to greatly modify mobility behaviours, travel demands and habits, traffic flow characteristics, traffic safety and related external impacts. Tools and methodologies are needed to evaluate the effects of CAVs on traffic streams, as well as the impact on traffic externalities. This is particularly relevant under mixed traffic conditions, where human-driven vehicles and CAVs will interact. Understanding technological aspects (e.g. communication protocols, control algorithms, etc.) is crucial for analysing the impact of CAVs, but the modification induced in human driving behaviours by the presence of CAVs is also of paramount importance. For this reason, the definition of appropriate CAV investigations methods and tools represents a key (and open) issue. One of the most promising approaches for assessing the impact of CAVs is operator in the loop simulators, since having a real driver involved in the simulation represents an advantageous approach. However, the behaviour of the driver in the simulator must be validated and this paper discusses the results of some experiments concerning car-following behaviour. These experiments have included both driving simulators and an instrumented vehicle, and have observed the behaviours of a large sample of drivers, in similar conditions, in different experimental environments. Similarities and differences in driver behaviour will be presented and discussed with respect to the observation of one important quantity of car-following, the maintained spacing.

[1]  Jennie Lioris,et al.  Platoons of connected vehicles can double throughput in urban roads , 2015, 1511.00775.

[2]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  R. M. Michaels,et al.  Perceptual Factors in Car-Following , 1963 .

[4]  Stewart A. Birrell,et al.  Test Scenario Generation for Driving Simulators Using Constrained Randomization Technique , 2017 .

[5]  I. Greenberg The log normal distribution of headways , 1966 .

[6]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation , 2017 .

[7]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Microsimulation Modeling of Coordination of Automated Guided Vehicles at Intersections , 2012 .

[8]  Ren Wang,et al.  Comparing traffic state estimators for mixed human and automated traffic flows , 2017 .

[9]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  Vehicle headway distribution in work zones , 2014 .

[11]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput , 2016 .

[12]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of active vehicle safety systems. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Urbano Nunes,et al.  Platooning of autonomous vehicles with intervehicle communications in SUMO traffic simulator , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Autonomous car and ride sharing: flexible road trains: (vision paper) , 2016, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[15]  Hans-Peter Schöner,et al.  The Behavioral Validity of Dual-Task Driving Performance in Fixed and Moving Base Driving Simulators , 2016 .

[16]  Gustav Markkula,et al.  Understanding Cue Utility in Controlled Evasive Driving Manoeuvres: Optimizing Vestibular Cues for Simulator & Human Abilities , 2016 .

[17]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Identifying a gap in existing validation methodologies for intelligent automotive systems: Introducing the 3xD simulator , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[18]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Tetsuo Yai,et al.  Development of the Driving Simulation System MOVIC-T4 and Its Validation Using Field Driving Data , 2007 .

[20]  János Abonyi,et al.  Modified Gath-Geva clustering for fuzzy segmentation of multivariate time-series , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Adel W. Sadek,et al.  Integrated Traffic-Driving-Networking Simulator for the Design of Connected Vehicle Applications: Eco-Signal Case Study , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[22]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Driving to Safety , 2016 .

[23]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Incorporating human-factors in car-following models : a review of recent developments and research needs , 2014 .

[24]  Gennaro Nicola Bifulco,et al.  Coupling instrumented vehicles and driving simulators: Opportunities from the DRIVE IN2 project , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Development of a Drive-in Driver-in-the-Loop Fully Immersive Driving Simulator for Virtual Validation of Automotive Systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[26]  Rosaldo J. F. Rossetti,et al.  An integrated architecture for autonomous vehicles simulation , 2012, SAC '12.

[27]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Were they in the loop during automated driving? Links between visual attention and crash potential , 2016, Injury Prevention.