So many filters, so little time: the development of a search filter appraisal checklist.

OBJECTIVES The authors developed a tool to assess the quality of search filters designed to retrieve records for studies with specific research designs (e.g., diagnostic studies). METHODS The UK InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group (ISSG), a group of experienced health care information specialists, reviewed the literature to evaluate existing search filter appraisal tools and determined that existing tools were inadequate for their needs. The group held consensus meetings to develop a new filter appraisal tool consisting of a search filter appraisal checklist and a structured abstract. ISSG members tested the final checklist using three published search filters. RESULTS The detailed ISSG Search Filter Appraisal Checklist captures relevance criteria and methods used to develop and test search filters. The checklist includes categorical and descriptive responses and is accompanied by a structured abstract that provides a summary of key quality features of a filter. DISCUSSION The checklist is a comprehensive appraisal tool that can assist health sciences librarians and others in choosing search filters. The checklist reports filter design methods and search performance measures, such as sensitivity and precision. The checklist can also aid filter developers by indicating information on core methods that should be reported to help assess filter suitability. The generalizability of the checklist for non-methods filters remains to be explored.

[1]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[2]  Penny Whiting,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access No Role for Quality Scores in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2005 .

[3]  Michelle Jenkins,et al.  Evaluation of methodological search filters--a review. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[4]  J. Glanville,et al.  Searching for Studies , 2008 .

[5]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  Identifying systematic reviews in MEDLINE: developing an objective approach to search strategy design , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[7]  Li Zhang,et al.  Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[8]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  et al.,et al.  An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care , 2005, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[11]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  Lucas M. Bachmann,et al.  Research Paper: Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to Read , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE , 2004, MedInfo.

[14]  Carol Lefebvre,et al.  The effect of postings information on searching behaviour A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews : objectivity enhances accuracy , 2001 .