Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk

This article reviews recent developments in the economic theory of individual decision making under risk. Since the 1950s it has been known that individual choices violate the standard model of expected utility in predictable ways. Considerable research effort has now been devoted to the project of developing a superior descriptive model. Following an overview of non-expected utility theories which distinguishes between "conventional" and "non-conventional" approaches, the paper seeks to assess these alternative models in terms of empirical success (using laboratory and field data) and theoretical usefulness. The closing sections reflect on some new directions emerging in this literature.

[1]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Regret in Decision Making , 2002 .

[2]  Robert Sugden,et al.  A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice , 2002 .

[3]  M. Abdellaoui.  A Genuine Rank-Dependent Generalization of the Von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility Theorem , 2002 .

[4]  Erik Schokkaert,et al.  Risk perceptions and distributional judgments , 2001 .

[5]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Martin Weber,et al.  What Determines the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Under Uncertainty? , 1998, Manag. Sci..

[7]  L. Eeckhoudt.  Espérance d’utilité et nouveaux modèles de choix dans le risque : une connivence cachée , 2001 .

[8]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  Naive Reinforcement Learning With Endogenous Aspirations , 2000 .

[9]  B. Jullien,et al.  Estimating Preferences under Risk: The Case of Racetrack Bettors , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  M. Rabin.  Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[11]  Francesco Guala,et al.  The logic of normative falsification: rationality and experiments in decision theory , 2000 .

[12]  John Bone,et al.  Are Groups More (or Less) Consistent Than Individuals? , 1999 .

[13]  George Wu,et al.  Anxiety and Decision Making with Delayed Resolution of Uncertainty , 1999 .

[14]  C. Starmer.  Cycling with Rules of Thumb: An Experimental Test for a new form of Non-Transitive Behaviour , 1999 .

[15]  C. Starmer,et al.  Experiments in economics: should we trust the dismal scientists in white coats? , 1999 .

[16]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[18]  P. Wakker.  Using Descriptive Findings of Prospect Theory to Improve Prescriptive Applications of Expected Utility , 1999 .

[19]  R. Sugden,et al.  Testing Different Stochastic Specificationsof Risky Choice , 1998 .

[20]  Steven J. Humphrey.  More mixed results on boundary effects , 1998 .

[21]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  The Selection of Preferences Through Imitation , 1998 .

[22]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Testing Descriptive Utility Theories: Violations of Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Independence , 1998 .

[23]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Dynamic Choice and the Common Ratio Effect: An Experimental Investigation , 1998 .

[24]  Colin Camerer.  Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making , 1998 .

[25]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System , 1998 .

[26]  Kaisa Herne,et al.  Testing the reference‐dependent model: an experiment on asymmetrically dominated reference points , 1998 .

[27]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Testing Alternative Explanations of Cyclical Choices , 1998 .

[28]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Characterising QALY's under a general rank dependent utility model , 1998 .

[29]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[30]  Jonathan W. Leland.  Similarity Judgments in Choice Under Uncertainty: a Reinterpretation of the Predictions of Regret Theory , 1998 .

[31]  Colin Camerer.  Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field , 1998 .

[32]  Chip Heath,et al.  Psychological Factors and Stock Option Exercise , 1998 .

[33]  A. Munro.  Loss Aversion and Welfare Economics , 1998 .

[34]  Enrica Carbone,et al.  Investigation of stochastic preference theory using experimental data , 1997 .

[35]  C. Plott,et al.  Exchange Economies and Loss Exposure: Experiments Exploring Prospect Theory and Competitive Equilibria in Market Environments , 1997 .

[36]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  Learning Through Reinforcement and Replicator Dynamics , 1997 .

[37]  N. Wilcox,et al.  Decisions, Error and Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[38]  Dorla A. Evans.  The Role of Markets in Reducing Expected Utility Violations , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  I. Bateman,et al.  A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 1997 .

[40]  G. Loomes,et al.  The Impact of Incentives Upon Risky Choice Experiments , 1997 .

[41]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Characterizing QALYs under a General Rank Dependent Utility Model , 1997 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  Probabilistic Insurance , 1998 .

[43]  Uzi Segal.  Dynamic Consistency and Reference Points , 1997 .

[44]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function , 1996 .

[45]  J. Rachlinski.  Gains, Losses, and the Psychology of Litigation , 1996 .

[46]  P. Wakker,et al.  Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown , 1996 .

[47]  R. D. Smith,et al.  Is Regret Theory an alternative basis for estimating the value of healthcare interventions? , 1996, Health policy.

[48]  E. McClennen.  Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations , 1996 .

[49]  Edi Karni.  Non-expected utility and the robustness of the classical insurance paradigm: discussion. , 1996 .

[50]  Michèle Cohen,et al.  Risk-aversion concepts in expected- and non-expected-utility models. , 1996 .

[51]  David M. Grether,et al.  The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives , 1996 .

[52]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  You have printed the following article : Violations of Monotonicity in Choices between Gambles and Certain Cash , 2008 .

[53]  Robin P. Cubitt.  RATIONAL DYNAMIC CHOICE AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY , 1996 .

[54]  J. Conlisk.  Why Bounded Rationality , 1996 .

[55]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[56]  Steven J. Humphrey.  Regret aversion or event-splitting effects? more evidence under risk and uncertainty , 1995 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights , 1995 .

[58]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes , 1995 .

[59]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Non-Expected Utility and The Robustness of the Classical Insurance Paradigm , 1995 .

[60]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories , 1995 .

[61]  I. Erev,et al.  Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories , 1994 .

[62]  J. Quiggin.  Generalized expected utility theory : the rank-dependent model , 1994 .

[63]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[64]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[65]  Allan Timmermann,et al.  Can Agents Learn to Form Rational Expectations? Some Results on Convergence and Stability of Learning in the UK Stock Market , 1994 .

[66]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[67]  John Quiggin,et al.  Regret theory with general choice sets , 1994 .

[68]  George Wu.  An empirical test of ordinal independence , 1994 .

[69]  Alain Chateauneuf,et al.  Risk seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non-expected utility model , 1994 .

[70]  P. Wakker.  Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion , 1994 .

[71]  P. Anand,et al.  Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk. , 1993 .

[72]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis , 1993 .

[73]  B. Sopher,et al.  A test of generalized expected utility theory , 1993 .

[74]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects , 1993 .

[75]  Robert Sugden,et al.  An Axiomatic Foundation for Regret Theory , 1993 .

[76]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[77]  W. Samuels.  The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics , 1993 .

[78]  Chew Soo Hong,et al.  A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-expected Utility Theories: Correction and Comment , 1993 .

[79]  Larry G. Epstein.  Advances in Economic Theory: Behavior under risk: recent developments in theory and applications , 1993 .

[80]  David Parkinson,et al.  Risk: Analysis, perception and management. report of a Royal Society Study Group: Pp 201. The Royal Society. 1992. Paperback £15.50 ISBN 0 85403 467 6 , 1993 .

[81]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[82]  A M Kellerer,et al.  Risk perception , 1993, Nature.

[83]  Uzi Segal,et al.  The measure representation: A correction , 1993 .

[84]  M. Lavoie.  Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis , 1993 .

[85]  Daniel M. Hausman,et al.  The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics , 1993 .

[86]  William S. Neilson.  A mixed fan hypothesis and its implications for behavior toward risk , 1992 .

[87]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[88]  C. Starmer,et al.  Testing New Theories of Choice under Uncertainty using the Common Consequence Effect , 1992 .

[89]  David W Harless,et al.  Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory , 1992 .

[90]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  Quadratic Social Welfare Functions , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[91]  William S. Neilson.  Some mixed results on boundary effects , 1992 .

[92]  A. Witte,et al.  The Influence of Probability on Risky Choice: A Parametric Examination , 1992 .

[93]  Graham Loomes,et al.  Non-transitive Preferences over Gains and Losses , 1992 .

[94]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Are Preferences Monotonic? Testing Some Predictions of Regret Theory , 1992 .

[95]  Colin Camerer.  Recent Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory , 1992 .

[96]  Zvi Safra,et al.  Existence and dynamic consistency of Nash equilibrium with non-expected utility preferences , 1991 .

[97]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[98]  R. Sugden.  Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy , 1991 .

[99]  Faruk Gul.  A Theory of Disappointment Aversion , 1991 .

[100]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[101]  Robert Sugden,et al.  OBSERVING VIOLATIONS OF TRANSITIVITY BY EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1991 .

[102]  J. Quiggin.  ON THE OPTIMAL DESIGN OF LOTTERIES , 1991 .

[103]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  MIXTURE SYMMETRY AND QUADRATIC UTILITY , 1991 .

[104]  P. Fishburn,et al.  Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles , 1991 .

[105]  John Quiggin,et al.  Comparative statics for rank-dependent expected utility theory , 1990 .

[106]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  First order risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle , 1990 .

[107]  Zvi Safra,et al.  Behaviorally consistent optimal stopping rules , 1990 .

[108]  Uzi Segal,et al.  First order versus second order risk aversion , 1990 .

[109]  A. Tversky,et al.  Anomalies: Preference Reversals , 1990 .

[110]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Two Stage Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom , 1990 .

[111]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[112]  V. Crawford.  Equilibrium without independence , 1990 .

[113]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[114]  M. Allais,et al.  Criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School. , 1990 .

[115]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theories , 1989 .

[116]  W. Viscusi.  Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes , 1989 .

[117]  Edi Karni,et al.  Revelations in auctions and the structure of preferences , 1989 .

[118]  Larry G. Epstein,et al.  Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework , 1989 .

[119]  R. Sugden,et al.  Violations of the independence axion in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses , 1989 .

[120]  Zvi Safra,et al.  Ascending bid auctions with behaviorally consistent bidders , 1989 .

[121]  S. Chew.  Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property , 1989 .

[122]  Uzi Segal.  Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach , 1989 .

[123]  Colin Camerer.  An experimental test of several generalized utility theories , 1989 .

[124]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Comparative Statics and Non-expected Utility Preferences* , 1989 .

[125]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-transitive Choice? , 1989 .

[126]  J. Knetsch.  The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[127]  John Conlisk,et al.  Three Variants on the Allais Example , 1989 .

[128]  M. Machina.  Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[129]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory , 1988 .

[130]  A. Rubinstein.  Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?) , 1988 .

[131]  P. Hammond.  Consequentialist foundations for expected utility , 1988 .

[132]  Uzi Segal.  Probabilistic Insurance and Anticipated Utility , 1988 .

[133]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries , 1988 .

[134]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement , 1988 .

[135]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[136]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Does the Preference Reversal Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom , 1988 .

[137]  Joseph Zeira,et al.  Precautionary saving and risk aversion: An anticipated utility approach , 1988 .

[138]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Nonlinear preference and utility theory , 1988 .

[139]  B. Brackett.  New developments , 1987, Nature.

[140]  M. Machina.  Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved , 1987 .

[141]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities , 1987 .

[142]  Edi Karni,et al.  Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods , 1987 .

[143]  R. Sugden,et al.  Some implications of a more general form of regret theory , 1987 .

[144]  M. Yaari.  The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[145]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[146]  Eddie Dekel.  An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom , 1986 .

[147]  M. Weinstein.  Risky Choices in Medical Decision Making: A Survey , 1986 .

[148]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty , 1986 .

[149]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory , 1986 .

[150]  D. Schmeidler,et al.  SELF-PRESERVATION AS A FOUNDATION OF RATIONAL BEHAVIOR UNDER RISK , 1986 .

[151]  Robert Sugden,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE THEORY OF CHOICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY , 1986 .

[152]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom , 1986 .

[153]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[154]  David E. Bell,et al.  Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty , 1985, Oper. Res..

[155]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[156]  P. Fishburn.  Transitive measurable utility , 1983 .

[157]  S. Chew.  A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox , 1983 .

[158]  R. Sugden,et al.  A Rationale for Preference Reversal , 1983 .

[159]  M. Machina.  "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[160]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[161]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[162]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[163]  P. Fishburn.  Nontransitive measurable utility , 1982 .

[164]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[165]  Preferences Scientific.  Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[166]  P. Schoemaker.  The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[167]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[168]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[169]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[170]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[171]  Ole Hagen,et al.  Towards a Positive Theory of Preferences under Risk , 1979 .

[172]  K. MacCrimmon,et al.  Utility Theory: Axioms Versus ‘Paradoxes’ , 1979 .

[173]  M. Allais.  The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School (1952) , 1979 .

[174]  P. Fishburn,et al.  On Handa's "New Theory of Cardinal Utility" and the Maximization of Expected Return , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[175]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model , 1978 .

[176]  Mukhtar M. Ali.  Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[177]  Jagdish Handa,et al.  Risk, Probabilities, and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[178]  V. Smith.  Experimental Economics : Induced Value Theory , 2007 .

[179]  Harvey E. Lapan,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Insurance. , 1975 .

[180]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[181]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  EFFECTS OF PROBLEM REPRESENTATION AND FEEDBACK ON RATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN ALLAIS AND MORLAT‐TYPE PROBLEMS , 1974 .

[182]  H. Lindman.  Inconsistent preferences among gambles. , 1971 .

[183]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[184]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[185]  J. Mossin.  Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[186]  W. Edwards.  Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. , 1962, Psychological review.

[187]  W. Edwards.  The prediction of decisions among bets. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[188]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[189]  D. Bernoulli.  Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[190]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[191]  J. Marschak.  Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility (1950) , 1950 .

[192]  M. G. Preston,et al.  An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[193]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[194]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .