Implicit Multi-Feature Learning for Dynamic Time Series Prediction of the Impact of Institutions

Predicting the impact of research institutions is an important tool for decision makers, such as resource allocation for funding bodies. Despite significant effort of adopting quantitative indicators to measure the impact of research institutions, little is known that how the impact of institutions evolves in time. Previous studies have focused on using the historical relevance scores of different institutions to predict potential future impact for these institutions. In this paper, we explore the factors that can drive the changes of the impact of institutions, finding that the impact of an institution, as measured by the number of the accepted papers of the institution, more is determined by the authors’ influence of the institution. Geographic location of institution feature and state GDP can drive the changes of the impact of institutions. Identifying these features allows us to formulate a predictive model that integrates the effects of individual ability, location of institution, and state GDP. The model unveils the underlying factors driving the future impact of institutions, which can be used to accurately predict the future impact of institutions.

[1]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[2]  Gianluca Setti,et al.  Bibliometric Indicators: Why Do We Need More Than One? , 2013, IEEE Access.

[3]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[4]  J. Eloy,et al.  Are industry financial ties associated with greater scholarly impact among academic otolaryngologists? , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[6]  Peter Klimek,et al.  Successful fish go with the flow: citation impact prediction based on centrality measures for term–document networks , 2016, Scientometrics.

[7]  Feng Xia,et al.  Identifying Anomalous Citations for Objective Evaluation of Scholarly Article Impact , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Boosting and Additive Trees , 2009 .

[10]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[11]  Feng Xia,et al.  Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages , 2017, Scientometrics.

[12]  Yasin Orouskhani,et al.  Ranking Research Institutions Based On Related Academic Conferences , 2016, ArXiv.

[13]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Can Scientific Impact Be Predicted? , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[14]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded , 2016, Journal of Korean medical science.

[15]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Future impact: Predicting scientific success , 2012, Nature.

[16]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , 2016, Science.

[17]  Feng Xia,et al.  Bibliographic Analysis of Nature Based on Twitter and Facebook Altmetrics Data , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Author Impact Factor: tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[19]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  A data analytic approach to quantifying scientific impact , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  On the Predictability of Future Impact in Science , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Stephan B. Bruns,et al.  Research assessment using early citation information , 2016, Scientometrics.

[22]  Vlad Sandulescu,et al.  Predicting the future relevance of research institutions - The winning solution of the KDD Cup 2016 , 2016, ArXiv.

[23]  Stephen J. Bensman The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Reputation and impact in academic careers , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Feng Xia,et al.  Big Scholarly Data: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.