Social sustainability of renewable energy sources in electricity production: An application of the contingent valuation method

Abstract Sustainability is frequently defined by its three pillars: environmental, economic and social. Consequently the evaluation of the sustainability of a decision, public or private, requires information on these three dimensions. This paper focuses on social sustainability. In the context of renewable energy sources, the consideration of social sustainability requires the analysis of not only the efficiency but also the equity of the welfare impacts, including spatially differentiated impacts. The present paper proposes and applies a methodology to generate the information necessary to conduct a more complete welfare analysis of the social sustainability of renewable energy production facilities, so that equity considerations are treated alongside efficiency issues. The analysis focuses on the case of investments in renewable energy electricity production facilities, where the impacts on local residents’ welfare are often significantly different from the welfare effects on the general population. We apply the contingent valuation method to specific facilities across the different renewable energy sources in operation in Portugal and conclude that local residents acknowledge the damage sustained differently depending on the type, location and operation of the facilities. The results from these case studies attest to the need of acknowledging and quantifying the negative impacts on local communities so as to be able to assess the social sustainability of renewable energy projects, alongside the two other pillars of sustainability.

[1]  J. Loomis.  Measuring the Economic Benefits of Removing Dams and Restoring the Elwha River: Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey , 1996 .

[2]  Allison M. Borchers,et al.  Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? A contingent choice experiment , 2007 .

[3]  Marina Mura,et al.  Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: A latent class approach , 2012 .

[4]  A. Menegaki.  Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review , 2008 .

[5]  G. Gamboa,et al.  Integrating energy and land-use planning: socio-metabolic profiles along the rural–urban continuum in Catalonia (Spain) , 2014, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[6]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development , 2007 .

[7]  Egidio Dansero,et al.  Territory and energy sustainability: the challenge of renewable energy sources , 2010 .

[8]  S. Navrud,et al.  Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: Assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats , 2006 .

[9]  Teresa Del Giudice,et al.  Fossil energy versus nuclear, wind, solar and agricultural biomass: Insights from an Italian national survey , 2012 .

[10]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[11]  M. Kealy,et al.  The Value of Nonconsumptive Wildlife Recreation in the United States , 2012 .

[12]  Paula Varandas Ferreira,et al.  Public opinion on renewable energy technologies in Portugal , 2014 .

[13]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[14]  K. Tsagarakis,et al.  Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete , 2010 .

[15]  Eunnyeong Heo,et al.  Assessment of Korean customers’ willingness to pay with RPS , 2012 .

[16]  N. Dempsey,et al.  The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability , 2011 .

[17]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States , 2009 .

[18]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[19]  Eja Pedersen,et al.  Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Pau Rausell-Köster,et al.  A Double-Hurdle model of urban green areas valuation : Dealing with zero responses , 2008 .

[21]  Å. Moberg,et al.  Exploring Social Sustainability: Learning from Perspectives on Urban Development and Companies and Products , 2014 .

[22]  J. Whitehead,et al.  From Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman's “Dubious to Hopeless” Critique of Contingent Valuation , 2013 .

[23]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA , 1999 .

[24]  Conflicting values and public decision: The Foz Côa case , 2013 .

[25]  Yasemin E. K. Biro.  Valuation of the environmental impacts of the Kayraktepe Dam/Hydroelectric Project, Turkey: An exercise in contingent valuation , 1998 .

[26]  Gordon G. Brittan,et al.  Wind, energy, landscape: Reconciling nature and technology , 2001 .

[27]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[28]  C. Plott,et al.  The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the 'Endowment Effect,' Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations , 2005 .

[29]  Audun Ruud,et al.  Development of small versus large hydropower in Norway– comparison of environmental impacts , 2012 .

[30]  Hyowon Lee,et al.  The paradox of the sustainable city: definitions and examples , 2015, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[31]  G. P. van den Berg,et al.  The beat is getting stronger: The effect of atmospheric stability on low frequency modulated sound of wind turbines , 2005 .

[32]  Lígia Costa Pinto,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Assess Environmental Impacts of Dams in Portugal , 2015 .

[33]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development , 2005 .

[34]  Diana Gallego Carrera,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts , 2010 .

[35]  A. Stehr,et al.  Estimating the Economic Value of Landscape Losses Due to Flooding by Hydropower Plants in the Chilean Patagonia , 2011 .

[36]  Peter A. Groothuis,et al.  Green vs. green: Measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed , 2008 .

[37]  Ana Delicado,et al.  Community perceptions of renewable energies in Portugal: Impacts on environment, landscape and local development , 2016 .

[38]  Maria Madalena T. de Araújo,et al.  Sustainability assessment of electricity production using a logic models approach , 2013 .

[39]  S. M Rashad,et al.  Environmental-impact assessment of hydro-power in Egypt , 2000 .

[40]  R. S. D. Motta,et al.  The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil) , 2008 .

[41]  Takeshi Suzuki,et al.  Evaluating Economic Value of Coastal Waterfront in Tokyo Bay, Japan with Willingness-to-Accept Measure , 2009 .

[42]  M. Jonsell.  Effects on biodiversity of forest fuel extraction, governed by processes working on a large scale , 2007 .

[43]  Using Contingent Valuation to Measure the Compensation Required to Gain Community Acceptance of a Lulu: the Case of a Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility , 1998 .

[44]  Fanghua Hao,et al.  Vegetation response to 30 years hydropower cascade exploitation in upper stream of Yellow River , 2010 .

[45]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Experience and Cheap Talk influence Willingness to Pay in an Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey? , 2006 .

[46]  Seung-Hoon Yoo,et al.  WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GREEN ELECTRICITY IN KOREA: A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY , 2009 .

[47]  H. Gunerhan,et al.  Environmental Impacts from the Solar Energy Systems , 2008 .

[48]  Alberto Longo,et al.  Environmental pricing of externalities from different sources of electricity generation in Chile , 2012 .

[49]  G. Garnero,et al.  The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk , 2009 .

[50]  A. Lovett,et al.  Public opinion on energy crops in the landscape: considerations for the expansion of renewable energy from biomass , 2012 .