The personality of popular facebook users

We study the relationship between Facebook popularity (number of contacts) and personality traits on a large number of subjects. We test to which extent two prevalent viewpoints hold. That is, popular users (those with many social contacts) are the ones whose personality traits either predict many offline (real world) friends or predict propensity to maintain superficial relationships. We find that the predictor for number of friends in the real world (Extraversion) is also a predictor for number of Facebook contacts. We then test whether people who have many social contacts on Facebook are the ones who are able to adapt themselves to new forms of communication, present themselves in likable ways, and have propensity to maintain superficial relationships. We show that there is no statistical evidence to support such a conjecture.

[1]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[2]  D. Russell,et al.  Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: a structural equation analysis. , 1997, Journal of personality.

[3]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[4]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Our Twitter Profiles, Our Selves: Predicting Personality with Twitter , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[6]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[7]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Who's viewed you?: the impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application , 2009, CHI.

[8]  R. Swickert,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology: Personality and social support processes , 2009 .

[9]  Michael Argyle,et al.  Receiving and giving support: Effects on relationships and well-being , 1992 .

[10]  W. Graziano,et al.  Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[11]  Brad E. Sheese,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , 2020 .

[12]  R. Piedmont,et al.  The Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and Research Applications , 1998 .

[13]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[14]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto , 2010 .

[15]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[17]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  Personality: What Makes You the Way You Are , 2007 .

[18]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[19]  S. Gosling,et al.  e-Perceptions : Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites , 2004 .

[20]  Cathy S. Lin,et al.  Exploring the Personality Trait of Self-Monitoring on Technology Usage of Web Portals , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Anne West,et al.  ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook , 2009, New Media Soc..

[22]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[23]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection , 2009 .

[24]  John L. Smith,et al.  Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[25]  Zhong Chen,et al.  Efficient target strategies for contagion in scale-free networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[27]  Brent W. Roberts,et al.  Testing the measurement equivalence of personality adjective items across cultures , 2008 .

[28]  Scott Henderson,et al.  Neurosis and the Social Environment , 1982 .

[29]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  James B. Hittner,et al.  Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. , 2002 .

[31]  C. Kleck,et al.  The Company You Keep and the Image You Project: Putting Your Best Face Forward in Online Social Networks , 2007 .

[32]  A. Herrmann,et al.  The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs , 2005 .

[33]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[34]  C Anderson,et al.  Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  A. DeLongis,et al.  Coping with interpersonal stress: role of big five traits. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[36]  A. DeLongis,et al.  The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: the role of the big five personality factors. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[37]  N. Bowling,et al.  Giving and receiving social support at work: The roles of personality and reciprocity. , 2005 .

[38]  T. B. Gogolinski.  Effects Of Self-Monitoring and Public Self-Consciousness on Perceptions of Facebook Profiles , 2010 .

[39]  P. Costa,et al.  The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) , 2008 .

[40]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Predicting personality with social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[43]  P. Emmelkamp,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of Stress , 1999, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[44]  D. Berry,et al.  Affect and Personality as Predictors of Conflict and Closeness in Young Adults' Friendships , 2000 .

[45]  Clay Shirky,et al.  Here Comes Everybody , 2017 .

[46]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  J. Landers,et al.  YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT, BUT CAN YOU GET WHAT YOU NEED? PERSONALITY TRAITS AND SOCIAL SUPPORT IN MARRIAGE , 2005 .

[48]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample , 1986 .

[49]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Word usage and posting behaviors: modeling blogs with unobtrusive data collection methods , 2008, CHI.

[50]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[51]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Chapter 4 – The Web Experiment Method: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Solutions , 2000 .

[53]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Personality Impressions Based on Facebook Profiles , 2007, ICWSM.

[54]  B R Karney,et al.  The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  B. Hogan.  The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online , 2010 .