New Media and Political Marketing in the United States: 2012 and Beyond

Technology is an ever-evolving aspect of political campaigns in the United States. Even before the days when sophisticated survey research or television advertising burst on the scene, campaigners were seeking ways to campaign more efficiently and effectively. The Internet has provided a wealth of opportunities for candidates and their campaigns to use technology in creative and innovative ways. The 2008 U.S. presidential campaign clearly illustrated this. But the question becomes: What is next? Where does new media go from here, and, more importantly for scholars, what kind of research questions will be central when studying these new uses of technology? This article begins with a discussion of where new media, and the study of it, go in 2012 and beyond. We briefly take a look back at the 2008 election in which campaigns made great strides in the use of new media, breaking new ground by using tools such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other online video sharing sites and many others in ways that had not been seen before. We also look ahead and discuss what we expect in the 2012 U.S. elections and beyond. We do this from the perspective of campaigns—how candidates and their advisors as well as voters will use new media—and from the perspective of scholars: What are the directions for future research in these areas?

[1]  M. Hindman The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[2]  Chris Casey The Hill on the Net: Congress Enters the Information Age , 1996 .

[3]  J. Freedman,et al.  SELECTIVE EXPOSURE TO INFORMATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1967 .

[4]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[5]  David A. Dulio,et al.  The Web 2.0 Election: Does the Online Medium Matter? , 2011 .

[6]  M. J. Robinson,et al.  Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. , 1984 .

[7]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  M. Hindman,et al.  Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide , 2007 .

[9]  C. Williams,et al.  Social Media in the 2010 Congressional Elections , 2011 .

[10]  Laurel S. Gleason,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar , 2010 .

[11]  David A. Dulio,et al.  An experiment of campaign effects during the YouTube election , 2011, New Media Soc..

[12]  S. Schneider NEW MEDIA CAMPAIGNS AND THE MANAGED CITIZEN , 2007 .

[13]  M. Castells The Internet Galaxy , 2001 .

[14]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[15]  David S. Lassen,et al.  Twitter: The Electoral Connection? , 2011 .

[16]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  YouTube Users Watching and Sharing the News: A Uses and Gratifications Approach , 2008 .

[17]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  M. R. Kerbel,et al.  Blog for America and Civic Involvement , 2005 .

[19]  Brett A. Bumgarner,et al.  You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults , 2007, First Monday.

[20]  John M. Sides,et al.  Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[21]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[22]  Paul D. Sweeney,et al.  Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. , 1984 .

[23]  Guosong Shao,et al.  Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective , 2009, Internet Res..

[24]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[25]  John Eighmey,et al.  Adding Value in the Information Age: Uses and Gratifications of Sites on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[26]  Kajsa E. Dalrymple,et al.  Finally Informing the Electorate? How the Internet Got People Thinking about Presidential Politics in 2004 , 2007 .

[27]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Political Campaigning, Elections and the Internet: Comparing the US, UK, France and Germany , 2011 .

[28]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[29]  Roy C. Anderson Out of order , 1998, Nature.

[30]  Ronald H. Bayor,et al.  Computers and the Social Sciences , 1974 .

[31]  Kyu S. Hahn,et al.  Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .

[32]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Being a Citizen Online , 2002 .

[33]  Philip M. Napoli Media Diversity and Localism : Meaning and Metrics , 2006 .

[34]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[35]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Understanding Twitter Usage: What Drive People Continue to Tweet , 2010, PACIS.

[36]  Chapman Rackaway,et al.  Trickle-Down Technology? The Use of Computing and Network Technology in State Legislative Campaigns , 2007 .

[37]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the Election Cycle and Beyond. , 2006 .

[38]  Karin Gwinn Wilkins,et al.  The Role of Media in Public Disengagement from Political Life , 2000 .

[39]  D. Romer,et al.  Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking Meets Offline Civic Engagement , 2009 .

[40]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  The Electronic Bulletin Board: A Computer-Driven Mass Medium , 1984 .

[41]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  Surfing to the Élysée: The Internet in the 2007 French Elections , 2008 .

[42]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet:Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach , 2008 .

[43]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Stealth soapboxes: political information efficacy, cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers , 2008, New Media Soc..

[44]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning? , 2008 .

[45]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[46]  David Sanders,et al.  Message or Medium? Campaign Learning During the 2001 British General Election , 2003 .

[47]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Congressional Candidates' Use of YouTube in 2008: Its Frequency and Rationale , 2010 .

[48]  William J. Miller,et al.  We Can't All Be Obama: The Use of New Media in Modern Political Campaigns , 2013 .

[49]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[50]  J. Trippi The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything , 2005 .

[51]  E. Katz,et al.  On the use of the mass media for important things. , 1973 .

[52]  J. Cappella,et al.  Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good , 1997 .

[53]  James M. Fallows,et al.  Breaking the News: A Review Essay@@@Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy , 1996 .

[54]  M. Castells Die Internet-Galaxie , 2001 .

[55]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[56]  Azi Lev-On,et al.  Campaigning Online: Use of the Internet by Parties, Candidates and Voters in National and Local Election Campaigns in Israel , 2011 .

[57]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[58]  Richard F. Carter,et al.  Effectiveness of a Political Telethon , 1959 .

[59]  R. Mcclure,et al.  The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics , 1976 .

[60]  W. Lindblad,et al.  The future is now , 2010, Nature.

[61]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[62]  M. J. Robinson,et al.  Over the wire and on TV , 1983 .

[63]  R. Garrett Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate , 2009 .

[64]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[65]  R. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[66]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance , 2004 .

[67]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[68]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning: The Impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election , 2010 .

[69]  Thomas E. Ruggiero Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[70]  M. Phythian,et al.  Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation , 2008 .

[71]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  The 2008 Presidential Campaign: Political Cynicism in the Age of Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube , 2010 .

[72]  Jeff Gulati,et al.  Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress , 2010 .

[73]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[74]  Aaron Smith and Lee Rainie The internet and the 2008 election , 2008 .

[75]  C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[76]  James G. Webster,et al.  Diversity of Exposure , 2006 .

[77]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[78]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Twitter: An Examination of User Motives and Satisfaction of Twitter Use , 2009 .

[79]  D. Romer,et al.  Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking Meets Offline Social Capital , 2008 .

[80]  Allegra Gonzalez,et al.  Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..