Characterization of Electrophotographic Print Artifacts: Banding, Jitter, and Ghosting

Electrophotographic (EP) print banding, jitter, and ghosting artifacts are common sources of print quality degradation. Traditionally, the characterization of banding and jitter artifacts relies mainly on the assumption that the defect has either a horizontal or vertical orientation which permits the simple 1-D analysis of the defect profile. However, this assumption can easily be violated if a small amount of printer or scanner skew is introduced to the analyzed images. In some cases, the defect can inherently be neither vertical nor horizontal. In this case, unless the defect orientation has been accurately detected before analysis, the 1-D-based approaches could bias the estimation of the defect severity. In this paper, we present an approach to characterize the jitter and banding artifacts of unrestricted orientation using wavelet filtering and 2-D spectral analysis. We also present a new system for detecting and quantifying ghosting defects. It includes a design for a printed test pattern to emphasize the ghosting defect and facilitate further processing and analysis. Wavelet filtering and a template matching technique are used to detect the ghost location along and across the scanned test pattern. A new metric is developed to quantify ghosting based upon its contrast, shape, and location consistency. Our experimental results show that the proposed approaches provide objective measures that quantify EP defects with a rank ordering correlation coefficient of 0.8 to 0.98, as compared to the subjective assessment of print quality experts.

[1]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-time signal processing (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[2]  David J. Forrest,et al.  Evaluation of an LED Printer and Printhead using Print Quality Analysis , 2001 .

[3]  Kevin D. Donohue,et al.  Printer banding estimation using the generalized spectrum , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Paul Wintz,et al.  Digital image processing (2nd ed.) , 1987 .

[5]  Jan P. Allebach,et al.  Impact of HVS models on model-based halftoning , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Norman Burningham,et al.  Measurement of Electrophotographic Ghosting , 2001, PICS.

[7]  Toshihiko Takaya,et al.  The Characteristics of Ghost Mechanism in a Non-Magnetic Single Component Process depends on a diameter of the toner particle , 1998 .

[8]  David J. Forrest,et al.  Analysis of Ghosting in Electrophotography , 2000 .

[9]  Ahmed H. Eid,et al.  A unified framework for physical print quality , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Chengwu Cui,et al.  Wavelet Analysis of Print Defects , 2002, PICS.

[11]  Rene Rasmussen,et al.  Measurement of Macro-uniformity: Streaks Bands Mottle and Chromatic Variations , 2001, PICS.

[12]  Jan P. Allebach,et al.  Print Quality Test Page , 2004 .

[13]  Mohamed N. Ahmed,et al.  EP printer jitter characterization using 2D Gabor filter and spectral analysis , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Henry R. Kang Digital Color Halftoning , 1999 .

[15]  M. Langlois,et al.  Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers , 2005 .

[16]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A joint inter- and intrascale statistical model for Bayesian wavelet based image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Mohamed N. Ahmed,et al.  Characterization of Ghosting Defects in Electrophotographic Printers , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  A. W. M. van den Enden,et al.  Discrete Time Signal Processing , 1989 .

[19]  Jorge Herbert de Lira,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[20]  H.M. Wechsler,et al.  Digital image processing, 2nd ed. , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.