One year activity on subtraction MRI predicts subsequent 4 year activity and progression in multiple sclerosis

Objective To investigate the predictive value of 1 year subtraction MRI (sMRI) on activity and progression over the next 4 years in early phase multiple sclerosis (MS). To compare sensitivity of sMRI and contrast enhanced MRI towards disease activity. Methods The study was performed on 127 MS patients with brain MRI within 5 years of symptom onset (y0), after 1 year (y1) and after 5 years (y5). Measures of clinical (Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapse rate) and conventional MRI outcomes (brain parenchyma fraction (BPF); T2 lesion volume (T2LV); contrast enhancing lesions (CEL)) were available at all time points. sMRI was obtained from y1–y0, y5–y1 and y5–y0 image pairs and the number of new, enlarged, resolved and regressed lesions was counted. Results One year lesion change measured by sMRI predicted sMRI lesion change (p<0.0001), BPF and T2LV (p<0.05) changes, as well as clinical relapse rate (p<0.02) in the subsequent 4 years. sMRI measures were retained in stepwise predictive models that included other candidate MRI predictors. Active lesions on sMRI over a 1, 4 or 5 year interval provided a more sensitive assessment of disease activity than number of CEL at y0, y1 and/or y5: 83%, 93% and 90% of patients without CEL showed sMRI activity during the y1–y0, y5–y1, and y5–y0 intervals. Conclusions sMRI is a feasible and sensitive tool for detecting MS activity and may provide an alternative to contrast enhanced MRI in clinical practice, particularly in cases where CEL are not available or inconclusive. Furthermore, sMRI metrics combined with conventional MRI outcomes (CEL, T2LV, BPF) can increase the prediction of longer term MRI activity and progression.

[1]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[2]  A. Thompson,et al.  Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Thompson,et al.  Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1990, BMJ.

[4]  C. Guttmann,et al.  MR Imaging Intensity Modeling of Damage and Repair In Multiple Sclerosis: Relationship of Short-Term Lesion Recovery to Progression and Disability , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Charles R G Guttmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surrogates of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology and Their Relationship to Central Nervous System Atrophy , 2004, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[6]  R. Rudick,et al.  Significance of T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis: A 13‐year longitudinal study , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[7]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[8]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[9]  B Moraal,et al.  Segmentation of Subtraction Images for the Measurement of Lesion Change in Multiple Sclerosis , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[10]  S. Reingold,et al.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis , 1996, Neurology.

[11]  M Rovaris,et al.  Short-term brain volume change in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: effect of glatiramer acetate and implications. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Strategies for optimizing MRI techniques aimed at monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis treatment trials , 1997, Journal of Neurology.

[14]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Predicting short-term disability progression in early multiple sclerosis: added value of MRI parameters , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[15]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Subtraction MR images in a multiple sclerosis multicenter clinical trial setting. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  A. Thompson,et al.  Serial gadolinium‐enhanced MRI in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis of varying disease duration , 1992, Neurology.

[17]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Serial magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: correlation with attacks, disability, and disease stage , 2000, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[18]  Lublin Fd,et al.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. , 1996 .

[19]  Marco Rovaris,et al.  Short-term correlations between clinical and MR imaging findings in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  F. Jolesz,et al.  MRI contrast uptake in new lesions in relapsing-remitting MS followed at weekly intervals , 2003, Neurology.

[21]  Roberto Mutani,et al.  Grey Matter Pathology in Multiple Sclerosis , 2005, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[22]  C. Guttmann,et al.  Incidence and factors associated with treatment failure in the CLIMB multiple sclerosis cohort study , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[23]  C. Lederer,et al.  Disability as an outcome in MS clinical trials , 2008, Neurology.

[24]  K. Zou,et al.  Quantitative analysis of MRI signal abnormalities of brain white matter with high reproducibility and accuracy , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Improved detection of active multiple sclerosis lesions: 3D subtraction imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[26]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  MRI time series modeling of MS lesion development , 2006, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Rovaris,et al.  A reassessment of the plateauing relationship between T2 lesion load and disability in MS , 2009, Neurology.

[28]  J K Udupa,et al.  Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images--lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. , 1999, Radiology.

[29]  R. Kikinis,et al.  The evolution of multiple sclerosis lesions on serial MR. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  J. Duda,et al.  Brain atrophy in relapsing multiple sclerosis: relationship to relapses, EDSS, and treatment with interferon β-1a , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[31]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Long‐interval T2‐weighted subtraction magnetic resonance imaging: A powerful new outcome measure in multiple sclerosis trials , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[32]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Time-series analysis of MRI intensity patterns in multiple sclerosis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  J A Frank,et al.  MRI T2 lesion burden in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Neurology.

[34]  Andrew Riddehough,et al.  Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes Correlate in a Clinical Trial Monitoring Cyclosporine Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis , 1997, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[35]  Charles R G Guttmann,et al.  Can MRI reveal phenotypes of multiple sclerosis? , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  David H. Miller,et al.  Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials , 2009, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[37]  C. Lucchinetti,et al.  Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. , 2001, Trends in molecular medicine.

[38]  F. Barkhof The clinico‐radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[39]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Predictive value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis , 1999, The Lancet.

[40]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..