A COMPARISON OF DELTA CHANGE AND DOWNSCALED GCM SCENARIOS FOR THREE MOUNTAINOUS BASINS IN THE UNITED STATES 1

ABSTRACT: Simulated daily precipitation, temperature, and runoff time series were compared in three mountainous basins in the United States: (1) the Animas River basin in Colorado, (2) the East Fork of the Carson River basin in Nevada and California, and (3) the Cle Elum River basin in Washington State. Two methods of climate scenario generation were compared: delta change and statistical downscaling. The delta change method uses differences between simulated current and future climate conditions from the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research (HadCM2) General Circulation Model (GCM) added to observed time series of climate variables. A statistical downscaling (SDS) model was developed for each basin using station data and output from the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEPINCAR) reanalysis regridded to the scale of HadCM2. The SDS model was then used to simulate local climate variables using HadCM2 output for current and future conditions. Surface climate variables from each scenario were used in a precipitation‐runoff model. Results from this study show that, in the basins tested, a precipitation‐runoff model can simulate realistic runoff series for current conditions using statistically down‐scaled NCEP output. But, use of downscaled HadCM2 output for current or future climate assessments are questionable because the GCM does not produce accurate estimates of the surface variables needed for runoff in these regions. Given the uncertainties in the GCMs ability to simulate current conditions based on either the delta change or downscaling approaches, future climate assessments based on either of these approaches must be treated with caution.

[1]  J. M. Richards,et al.  A simple expression for the saturation vapour pressure of water in the range −50 to 140°C , 1971 .

[2]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[3]  G. Meehl,et al.  The Effect of CO2 Concentration on the Frequency of Blocking in a General Circulation Model Coupled to a Simple Mixed Layer Ocean Model , 1986 .

[4]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic impacts of global climatic changes , 1986 .

[5]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Comparison of the MSL synoptic pressure patterns of the Arctic as observed and simulated by the GISS General Circulation Model , 1988 .

[6]  G. McCabe,et al.  Simulation of precipitation by weather type analysis , 1991 .

[7]  B. Sevruk.  Precipitation measurement : WMO/IAHS/ETH workshop on Precipitation measurement St. Moritz, 3-7 December 1989 , 1989 .

[8]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Regional validation of means, variances, and spatial patterns in general circulation model control runs , 1990 .

[9]  D. Legates,et al.  General circulation model simulations of winter and summer sea‐level pressures over north America , 1992 .

[10]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System - PRMS. , 1995 .

[11]  B. Hewitson,et al.  Climate downscaling: techniques and application , 1996 .

[12]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  The Modular Modeling System (MMS): User's Manual , 1996 .

[13]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[14]  C. Goodess,et al.  The Simulation of Daily Temperature Time Series from GCM Output. Part II: Sensitivity Analysis of an Empirical Transfer Function Methodology , 1997 .

[15]  T. A. Buishand,et al.  COMPARISON OF CIRCULATION CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES FOR PREDICTING TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION IN THE NETHERLANDS , 1997 .

[16]  T. C. Johns,et al.  On Modification of Global Warming by Sulfate Aerosols , 1997 .

[17]  T. Wigley,et al.  Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations , 1997 .

[18]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation , 1997 .

[19]  L. Boorman,et al.  Climate change 1995—Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses: Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[20]  R. Wilby,et al.  Statistical downscaling of hydrometeorological variables using general circulation model output , 1998 .

[21]  L. Hay,et al.  A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado , 1999 .