Are all runoff processes the same? Numerical experiments comparing a Darcy‐Richards solver to an overland flow‐based approach for subsurface storm runoff simulation

Hillslope runoff theory is based largely on the differentiation between infiltration excess overland flow, saturation excess overland flow, and subsurface stormflow. Here we explore to what extent a 2-D friction-based overland flow model is useful for predicting hillslope-scale subsurface stormflow, posited here as phenomenologically the same as infiltration excess at depth. We compare our results to a 3-D variably saturated Darcy-Richards subsurface solver for individual rainfall runoff events. We use field data from the well-studied Panola Mountain Experimental hillslope in Georgia USA. Our results show that the two models are largely indistinguishable in terms of their ability to simulate the hillslope hydrograph magnitude and timing for a range of slopes and rainfall depths. Furthermore, we find that the descriptive ability of the overland flow model is comparable to the variably saturated subsurface flow model in terms of its ability to represent the spatial distribution of subsurface stormflow and infiltration across the soil-bedrock interface. More importantly, these results imply that the physics of infiltration excess subsurface stormflow at the soil-bedrock interface is similar to infiltration excess overland flow at the soil surface, in terms of detention storage, loss along the lower boundary, and threshold-like activation at the larger hillslope scale. Given the phenomenological similarity of overland flow and subsurface stormflow and the fact that overland flow model predictions are considerably faster to run (particularly as slope and rainfall depth increase), these findings imply that new forms of hillslope-scale subsurface storm runoff predictions may be possible with the knowledge of bedrock permeability and limited soil information. Finally, this work suggests that the role of soil mantle vis-a-vis subsurface stormflow is mainly as a filter that delays the development of patches of saturation along the bedrock surface. Our model results show that simple realizations of soil based on a few soil depth measurements can possibly be enough to characterize this filtering effect.

[1]  Hyosang Lee,et al.  Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments , 2005 .

[2]  C. Lanni,et al.  Simulated effect of soil depth and bedrock topography on near‐surface hydrologic response and slope stability , 2013 .

[3]  J. Nash Systematic determination of unit hydrograph parameters , 1959 .

[4]  Liliana Di Pietro,et al.  Scales and dimensions of momentum dissipation during preferential flow in soils , 1999 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils revisited , 2013 .

[6]  V. Singh Is hydrology kinematic? , 2002 .

[7]  Ronaldo I. Borja,et al.  The impacts of hysteresis on variably saturated hydrologic response and slope failure , 2010 .

[8]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  First‐order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water–groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics‐based approach , 2009 .

[9]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[10]  C. Simmons,et al.  Influence of the first-order exchange coefficient on simulation of coupled surface–subsurface flow , 2012 .

[11]  W. Green Studies in soil physics : I. The flow of air and water through soils , 1911 .

[12]  G. Gottardi,et al.  An accurate time integration method for simplified overland flow models , 2008 .

[13]  A reference data set of hillslope rainfall‐runoff response, Panola Mountain Research Watershed, United States , 2008 .

[14]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations , 2007, American Journal of Science.

[15]  J. Philip,et al.  THE THEORY OF INFILTRATION: 4. SORPTIVITY AND ALGEBRAIC INFILTRATION EQUATIONS , 1957 .

[16]  B. Mirus Evaluating the importance of characterizing soil structure and horizons in parameterizing a hydrologic process model , 2015 .

[17]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[18]  Keith Loague,et al.  The quixotic search for a comprehensive understanding of hydrologic response at the surface: Horton, Dunne, Dunton, and the role of concept‐development simulation , 2010 .

[19]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[20]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[21]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[22]  Xuefeng Chu,et al.  Dynamic puddle delineation and modeling of puddle‐to‐puddle filling‐spilling‐merging‐splitting overland flow processes , 2013 .

[23]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 1. sprinkling experiments , 2007, American Journal of Science.

[24]  Jim E Freer,et al.  Hydrological Dynamics of the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia , 2003 .

[25]  K. Beven,et al.  TOPOGRAPHIC CONTROLS ON SUBSURFACE STORM FLOWAT THE HILLSLOPE SCALE FOR TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DISTINCT SMALL CATCHMENTS , 1997 .

[26]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[27]  K. Beven Kinematic subsurface stormflow , 1981 .

[28]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology , 2007 .

[29]  Pierfranco Costabile,et al.  Comparative analysis of overland flow models using finite volume schemes , 2012 .

[30]  M. A. Medina,et al.  Kinematic and Diffusion Waves: Analytical and Numerical Solutions to Overland and Channel Flow , 2007 .

[31]  J. D. Hughes,et al.  MIKE SHE: Software for Integrated Surface Water/Ground Water Modeling , 2008 .

[32]  Mathieu Javaux,et al.  What indicators can capture runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot scale? , 2009 .

[33]  Keith Beven,et al.  Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? , 2009 .

[34]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Kinematic wave modelling in water resources: a historical perspective , 2001 .

[35]  Gunnar Lischeid,et al.  Effects of micro-topography on surface–subsurface exchange and runoff generation in a virtual riparian wetland — A modeling study , 2010 .

[36]  L. A. Richards Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums , 1931 .

[37]  P. Bates,et al.  Applicability of the local inertial approximation of the shallow water equations to flood modeling , 2013 .

[38]  W. Hoeffding,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling , 1961 .

[39]  Ming-ko Woo,et al.  Hydrology of subarctic Canadian shield: soil-filled valleys , 2003 .

[40]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Factors affecting the spatial pattern of bedrock groundwater recharge at the hillslope scale , 2015 .

[41]  Reza Modarres,et al.  Regional Dry Spells Frequency Analysis by L-Moment and Multivariate Analysis , 2010 .

[42]  B. McGlynn,et al.  Hierarchical controls on runoff generation: Topographically driven hydrologic connectivity, geology, and vegetation , 2011 .

[43]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[44]  Sven Frei,et al.  Representing effects of micro-topography on runoff generation and sub-surface flow patterns by using superficial rill/depression storage height variations , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Gypsies in the palace: experimentalist's view on the use of 3‐D physics‐based simulation of hillslope hydrological response , 2010 .

[46]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Hillslope threshold response to rainfall: (2) Development and use of a macroscale model , 2010 .

[47]  Benjamin B. Mirus,et al.  Simulated effect of a forest road on near‐surface hydrologic response: redux , 2005 .

[48]  G. Ampt,et al.  Studies on Soil Physics: Part II — The Permeability of an Ideal Soil to Air and Water , 1912, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[49]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[50]  J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of bedrock groundwater in rainfall-runoff response at hillslope and catchment scales , 2012 .

[51]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Base cation concentrations in subsurface flow from a forested hillslope: The role of flushing frequency , 1998 .

[52]  F. Fiedler,et al.  International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids a Numerical Method for Simulating Discontinuous Shallow Flow over an Infiltrating Surface , 2022 .

[53]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A virtual experiment on the effects of evaporation and intensity smoothing by canopy interception on subsurface stormflow generation , 2006 .

[54]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Tracer and hydrometric study of preferential flow in large undisturbed soil cores from the Georgia Piedmont, USA , 1999 .

[55]  Keith Beven,et al.  Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Q t =( S, R, Δt ) A as closure , 2006 .

[56]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. , 2009 .

[57]  Markus Weiler,et al.  New Dimensions of Hillslope Hydrology , 2011 .

[58]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[59]  J. Philip,et al.  The Theory of Infiltration , 1958 .

[60]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Are all runoff processes the same? , 2013 .

[61]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds , 1984 .

[62]  J. Nimmo Preferential flow occurs in unsaturated conditions , 2012 .

[63]  T. Huntington,et al.  Chemical weathering of the Panola Granite: Solute and regolith elemental fluxes and the weathering rate of biotite , 2001 .

[64]  Keith Beven,et al.  NEW METHOD DEVELOPED FOR STUDYING FLOW ON HILLSLOPES , 1996 .

[65]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Effect of bedrock permeability on subsurface stormflow and the water balance of a trenched hillslope at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA , 2007 .

[66]  K. Loague,et al.  How runoff begins (and ends): Characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale , 2013 .

[67]  William E Dietrich,et al.  A bottom-up control on fresh-bedrock topography under landscapes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  K. Beven On subsurface stormflow: Predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows , 1982 .

[69]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Examining the role of throughfall patterns on subsurface stormflow generation , 2011 .