The importance of upland flow paths in determining urban effects on stream ecosystems

Abstract Mitigation of urban effects on streams requires an understanding of the paths by which urban effects are transmitted from catchments to streams and how those effects are attenuated with distance. We assessed whether modeling attenuation from impervious surfaces and septic tanks along drainage lines improved prediction of 3 instream ecological indicators. Eleven regression models were calculated for each indicator (Escherichia coli, NO3/NO2, and Stream Invertebrate Grade Number Average Level [SIGNAL; a macroinvertebrate assemblage composition index]). Predictor variables included imperviousness or septic-tank density with no attenuation (i.e., total imperviousness and tank density), with overland attenuation (exponential decay with distance along topographic flow paths to stormwater drain or to stream), and with overland and instream attenuation (exponential decay with distance travelled within the stream). Escherichia coli was best predicted by the weighted density of septic tanks, with their influence attenuated to near 0 within tens of meters of the stream and within thousands of meters along streams. These results suggest strong overland attenuation of bacterial contamination and indicate that stormwater drains are not important pathways for septic leakage in this area. NO3/NO2, which is mobile through soils, was best predicted by nonattenuated septic-tank density within catchments. SIGNAL was best predicted by either impervious area or septic tanks within tens of meters of stormwater drains, a result suggesting that SIGNAL is most strongly affected by stormwater runoff routed through stormwater pipes to streams. Management of dry-weather fecal and N contamination in the study streams should focus on septic tank management (stricter maintenance regimes or replacement with other sewage management systems). Near-stream septic tanks are probably most important for fecal contamination, whereas catchment-wide management probably will be required for reduction of dry-weather N concentrations. Management of broader instream ecological condition, as indicated by macroinvertebrate assemblage composition, probably will require catchment-wide retention of stormwater runoff (using tanks or infiltration systems) to mimic natural flow-paths between catchments and streams.

[1]  Samantha J. Imberger,et al.  More microbial activity, not abrasive flow or shredder abundance, accelerates breakdown of labile leaf litter in urban streams , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[2]  S F Tyrrel,et al.  Overland flow transport of pathogens from agricultural land receiving faecal wastes , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[3]  S. Bacchus,et al.  Discriminating Sources and Flowpaths of Anthropogenic Nitrogen Discharges to Florida Springs, Streams and Lakes , 2005 .

[4]  Alison H. Purcell,et al.  Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[7]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Riparian Forests as Nutrient Filters in Agricultural Watersheds , 1984 .

[8]  S. Roberts,et al.  Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management , 2004 .

[9]  R. Gerritse,et al.  Nitrogen losses from a domestic septic tank system on the Darling Plateau in Western Australia , 1995 .

[10]  Christopher J. Walsh,et al.  Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient , 2006 .

[11]  M. Freeman,et al.  Reach-scale effects of riparian forest cover on urban stream ecosystems , 2005 .

[12]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones , 1997 .

[13]  P. Servais,et al.  Quantification of fecal coliform inputs to aquatic systems through soil leaching. , 2004, Water research.

[14]  W. Shuster,et al.  Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review , 2005 .

[15]  L. Band,et al.  Understanding, Managing, and Minimizing Urban Impacts on Surface Water Nitrogen Loading , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. M. Nally,et al.  Riverine invertebrate assemblages are degraded more by catchment urbanisation than by riparian deforestation , 2007 .

[17]  Tim D. Fletcher,et al.  Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  R. Adams,et al.  Overland flow delivery of faecal bacteria to a headwater pastoral stream , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[19]  C. J. Walsh Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design? , 2004 .

[20]  Jim Peterson,et al.  Drainage Network Modelling for Water-Sensitive Urban Design , 2009, Trans. GIS.

[21]  John Van Sickle,et al.  Parametric distance weighting of landscape influence on streams , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[23]  Rg Gerritse,et al.  Retention of nitrate and phosphate in soils of the Darling Plateau in Western Australia : implications for domestic septic tank systems , 1995 .

[24]  Puneet Srivastava,et al.  Stream ecosystem responses to spatially variable land cover: an empirically based model for developing riparian restoration strategies , 2007 .

[25]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[26]  S. Kilham,et al.  ELEVATED δ15N IN STREAM BIOTA IN AREAS WITH SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS IN AN URBAN WATERSHED , 2004 .

[27]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  Tim D Fletcher,et al.  The Influence of Urban Density and Drainage Infrastructure on the Concentrations and Loads of Pollutants in Small Streams , 2004, Environmental management.

[29]  B. Chessman,et al.  New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates , 2003 .