Specification and Estimation of Nested Logit Model of Home, Workplaces, and Commuter Mode Choices by Multiple-Worker Households

Household behavior in the selection of home location and the selection of workplace locations and commuting modes for employed members involves trade-offs among the attributes of the available alternatives for the different household members. A modified form of nested logit model representing this behavior has been developed and estimated using disaggregate revealed preference observations collected in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Three categories of choice—choice of home location for the household, choice of workplace location for each worker in the household, and choice of mode for the trip to work for each worker in the household—are treated as a joint choice made by the household, allowing for differing numbers of workers in different households. A nesting structure that takes into account the greater similarity among mode alternatives is combined with a system for weighting, by age and gender, the contributions of different individual workers’ utilities to the total household utility. This leads to a nested logit model in which each household has its own nesting structure that is based on the age and gender of the household members. The utility function coefficients and weighting function parameters were estimated with full-information maximum likelihood by using purpose-built software. The resulting model extends consideration of household spatial behavior at the disaggregate level beyond the one-worker and sequential-conditional choice paradigms and provides various insights into the nature of this behavior.

[1]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: Transportation versus other factors , 1980 .

[2]  J. Madden Why Women Work Closer to Home , 1981 .

[3]  D. Hensher Sequential and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Nested Logit Model , 1986 .

[4]  M. Wegener Operational Urban Models State of the Art , 1994 .

[5]  Steven R Lerman,et al.  LOCATION, HOUSING, AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP, AND MODE TO WORK: A JOINT CHOICE MODEL , 1976 .

[6]  G Giuliano,et al.  Research Policy and Review 27. New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land Use , 1989 .

[7]  H. Williams,et al.  Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models☆ , 1982 .

[8]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Estimating “tree” logit models , 1987 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF NESTED LOGIT MODELS , 1985 .

[10]  W. T. Watterson DYNAMICS OF JOB AND HOUSING LOCATIONS AND THE WORK TRIP: EVIDENCE FROM PUGET SOUND TRANSPORTATION PANEL , 1994 .

[11]  T. Amemiya On a two-step estimation of a multivariate logit model , 1978 .

[12]  John Douglas Hunt,et al.  STATED PREFERENCE INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENCES ON ATTRACTIVENESS OF RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONS , 1994 .

[13]  Wayne Simpson,et al.  Workplace Location, Residential Location, and Urban Commuting , 1987 .

[14]  D.,et al.  Stated Preference Investigation of Influences on Attractiveness of Residential Locations , 2022 .

[15]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[16]  G. Giuliano NEW DIRECTIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE , 1988 .

[17]  H. Williams On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[18]  A. Daly,et al.  MODELS USING MIXED STATED-PREFERENCE AND REVEALED-PREFERENCE INFORMATION. , 1991 .

[19]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[20]  H. Oppewal,et al.  Residential Choice Behaviour of Dual Earner Households: A Decompositional Joint Choice Model , 1992 .

[21]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[22]  M. White,et al.  A model of residential location choice and commuting by men and women workers. , 1977, Journal of regional science.

[23]  Jane H. Lillydahl,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Commute to Work Patterns of Males and Females in Two-Earner Households , 1986 .