Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-D space

Previous studies have shown that spatial attention can shift in three-dimensional (3-D) space determined by binocular disparity. Using Posner′s precueing paradigm, the current work examined whether attentional selection occurs in perceived 3-D space defined by occlusion. Experiment 1 showed that shifts of spatial attention induced by central cues between two surfaces in the left and right visual fields did not differ between the conditions when the two surfaces were located at the same or different perceptual depth. In contrast, Experiment 2 found that peripheral cues generated a stronger cue validity effect when the two surfaces were perceived at a different rather than at the same perceptual depth. The results suggest that exogenous but not endogenous attention operates in perceived 3-D space.

[1]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .

[5]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Effects of Perceived Space on Spatial Attention , 1999 .

[6]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. Folk,et al.  Shifting Visual Attention in Stereographic Displays: A Time Course Analysis , 1994, Human factors.

[10]  C. Folk,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-blind” attentional spotlight , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  C M Moore,et al.  Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[15]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control within 3-D space. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  DH Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18 , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Klein,et al.  Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Juola,et al.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.