Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla

High‐field arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion MRI is appealing because it provides not only increased signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), but also advantages in terms of labeling due to the increased relaxation time T1 of labeled blood. In the present study, we provide a theoretical framework for the dependence of the ASL signal on the static field strength, followed by experimental validation in which a multislice pulsed ASL (PASL) technique was carried out at 4T and compared with PASL and continuous ASL (CASL) techniques at 1.5T, both in the resting state and during motor activation. The resting‐state data showed an SNR ratio of 2.3:1.4:1 in the gray matter and a contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of 2.7:1.1:1 between the gray and white matter for the difference perfusion images acquired using 4T PASL, 1.5T CASL, and 1.5T PASL, respectively. However, the functional data acquired using 4T PASL did not show significantly improved sensitivity to motor cortex activation compared with the 1.5T functional data, with reduced fractional perfusion signal change and increased intersubject variability. Possible reasons for these experimental results, including susceptibility effects and physiological noise, are discussed. Magn Reson Med 48:242–254, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  T. Reese,et al.  Multislice perfusion and perfusion territory imaging in humans with separate label and image coils , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R. Hoge,et al.  Perfusion‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging with single‐shot RARE and GRASE acquisitions , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  D. S. Williams,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Detre,et al.  Noninvasive MRI evaluation of cerebral blood flow in cerebrovascular disease , 1998, Neurology.

[6]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[7]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Detre,et al.  Assessment of cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease by spin‐labeled magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[9]  A. Nobre,et al.  Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  Peter Jezzard,et al.  Physiological Noise: Strategies for Correction , 2000 .

[11]  P T Fox,et al.  Perfusion‐weighted imaging of interictal hypoperfusion in temporal lobe epilepsy using FAIR‐HASTE: Comparison with H215O PET measurements , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST) , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Multislice Imaging of Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion with Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Mr perfusion studies with t1‐weighted echo planar imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  J. Detre,et al.  Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. , 1998, Radiology.

[19]  E C Wong,et al.  Comparison of simultaneously measured perfusion and BOLD signal increases during brain activation with T1‐based tissue identification , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Multislice perfusion imaging in human brain using the C‐FOCI inversion pulse: Comparison with hyperbolic secant , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  David C. Alsop,et al.  Perfusion fMRI with Arterial Spin Labeling , 2000 .

[22]  J. Detre,et al.  Cerebral perfusion and arterial transit time changes during task activation determined with continuous arterial spin labeling , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  J. Detre,et al.  Reduced Transit-Time Sensitivity in Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Cerebral Blood Flow , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  J. Detre,et al.  Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. , 2000, Stroke.

[26]  R. Buxton,et al.  Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II) , 1998 .

[27]  D. Tank,et al.  4 Tesla gradient recalled echo characteristics of photic stimulation‐induced signal changes in the human primary visual cortex , 1993 .

[28]  Seong-Gi Kim.  Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: Application to functional mapping , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  S Warach,et al.  A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  R B Buxton,et al.  A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  S G Kim,et al.  Accurate T1 determination from inversion recovery images: Application to human brain at 4 Tesla , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  B. Siewert,et al.  STAR‐HASTE: Perfusion imaging without magnetic susceptibility artifact , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T , 1999, NeuroImage.

[34]  E. C. Wong,et al.  Potential and Pitfalls of Arterial Spin Labeling Based Perfusion Imaging Techniques for MRI , 2000 .

[35]  Yue Cao,et al.  Single‐coil arterial spin‐tagging for estimating cerebral blood flow as viewed from the capillary: Relative contributions of intra‐ and extravascular signal , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Experimental Design and the Relative Sensitivity of BOLD and Perfusion fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.