Michel Serres

The work of Michel Serres has not found a great audience within Anglophone Social Science, despite his substantial influence on modern Science Studies. This article offers an introduction to his thought. Serres is a global thinker who describes his work as 'structuralist'. The notion of translation as a way of describing the communication and movements between different forms of knowledge and cultural practice is central. Serres offers a philosophy of science that is in stark opposition to the Bachelardian tradition of 'epistemic ruptures'. In order to make a break with 'breaks', Serres offers an account of science and cultural practice as multiplicities that are immersed within noise. Structure, when it emerges, comes about in acts of parasitism. Serres then explores how human relations obey a 'parasite logic' which contains an attendant risk of sacrifice. This risk is managed through the circulation of 'quasiobjects'. Serres' later work poses the question of what we can hope for when this circulation itself begins to falter

[1]  T. Tanner.  In two voices , 1993 .

[2]  H Atlan,et al.  On a formal definition of organization. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Enlightenment without the Critique: A Word on Michel Serres' Philosophy , 1987, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series.

[4]  M. Serres,et al.  Angels: A Modern Myth , 1995 .

[5]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[6]  C. Lawrence.  The pasteurization of France , 1990, Medical History.

[7]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Martin Jay,et al.  Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought , 1993 .

[9]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The information age: Economy, society and culture. , 1998 .

[10]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[11]  N. K. Hayles.  Two Voices, One Channel: Equivocation in Michel Serres , 1988 .

[12]  Maria L. Assad.  Language, Nonlinearity, and the Problem of Evil , 2000 .

[13]  Josué V. Harari,et al.  Hermes--literature, science, philosophy , 1982 .

[14]  J. Derrida.  Writing and Difference , 1967 .

[15]  Tom LeClair,et al.  The Noise of Culture: Literary Texts in a World of Information , 1988 .

[16]  N. Katherine Hayles,et al.  Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science , 1990 .

[17]  M. Serres.  The Birth of Physics , 2000 .

[18]  M. Callon.  Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not , 1980 .

[19]  J. Rabins,et al.  Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century , 1992 .

[20]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[21]  M. Serres,et al.  A History of Scientific Thought: Elements of a HIstory of Science , 1995 .

[22]  Michel Serres.  Rome: The Book of Foundations , 1991 .

[23]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology , 1986 .

[24]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[25]  R. Cooper.  The Visibility of Social Systems , 1998 .