Recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by Tn7-like transposons

Significance CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immunity system that protects bacteria and archaea from mobile genetic elements. We present comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of minimal CRISPR-Cas variants associated with distinct families of transposable elements and develop the hypothesis that such repurposed defense systems contribute to the transposable element propagation by facilitating transposition into specific sites. Thus, these transposable elements are predicted to propagate via RNA-guided transposition, a mechanism that has not been previously described for DNA transposons. A survey of bacterial and archaeal genomes shows that many Tn7-like transposons contain minimal type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems that consist of fused cas8f and cas5f, cas7f, and cas6f genes and a short CRISPR array. Several small groups of Tn7-like transposons encompass similarly truncated type I-B CRISPR-Cas. This minimal gene complement of the transposon-associated CRISPR-Cas systems implies that they are competent for pre-CRISPR RNA (precrRNA) processing yielding mature crRNAs and target binding but not target cleavage that is required for interference. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that evolution of the CRISPR-Cas–containing transposons included a single, ancestral capture of a type I-F locus and two independent instances of type I-B loci capture. We show that the transposon-associated CRISPR arrays contain spacers homologous to plasmid and temperate phage sequences and, in some cases, chromosomal sequences adjacent to the transposon. We hypothesize that the transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems generate displacement (R-loops) in the cognate DNA sites, targeting the transposon to these sites and thus facilitating their spread via plasmids and phages. These findings suggest the existence of RNA-guided transposition and fit the guns-for-hire concept whereby mobile genetic elements capture host defense systems and repurpose them for different stages in the life cycle of the element.

[1]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[2]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. , 2017, Current opinion in microbiology.

[3]  Sergey A. Shmakov,et al.  The CRISPR spacer space is dominated by sequences from the species-specific mobilome , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  CRISPR-Cas: Adapting to change , 2017, Science.

[5]  E. Koonin.  Evolution of RNA- and DNA-guided antivirus defense systems in prokaryotes and eukaryotes: common ancestry vs convergence , 2017, Biology Direct.

[6]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR–Cas systems , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  New CRISPR-Cas systems from uncultivated microbes , 2016, Nature.

[8]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems , 2016, Science.

[9]  A. Pingoud,et al.  Type II restriction endonucleases — a historical perspective and more , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  H. Urlaub,et al.  Modulating the Cascade architecture of a minimal Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Joshua R. Elmore,et al.  Bipartite recognition of target RNAs activates DNA cleavage by the Type III-B CRISPR–Cas system , 2016, Genes & development.

[12]  M. F. White,et al.  Multiple nucleic acid cleavage modes in divergent type III CRISPR systems , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  CRISPR–Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  J. Geiger,et al.  A model for genesis of transcription systems , 2016, Transcription.

[15]  K. Datsenko,et al.  Foreign DNA acquisition by the I-F CRISPR–Cas system requires all components of the interference machinery , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Sita J. Saunders,et al.  An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Conformational toggling controls target site choice for the heteromeric transposase element Tn7 , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Hong Li,et al.  Structure Principles of CRISPR-Cas Surveillance and Effector Complexes. , 2015, Annual review of biophysics.

[19]  B. Wiedenheft,et al.  A Conserved Structural Chassis for Mounting Versatile CRISPR RNA-Guided Immune Responses. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[20]  B. Graveley,et al.  Three CRISPR-Cas immune effector complexes coexist in Pyrococcus furiosus , 2015, RNA.

[21]  Luciano A. Marraffini,et al.  Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA Cleavage during Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity , 2015, Cell.

[22]  Malcolm F. White,et al.  Biogenesis pathways of RNA guides in archaeal and bacterial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity , 2015, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[23]  Asaf Levy,et al.  CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA , 2015, Nature.

[24]  M. Rutkauskas,et al.  Directional R-Loop Formation by the CRISPR-Cas Surveillance Complex Cascade Provides Efficient Off-Target Site Rejection. , 2015, Cell reports.

[25]  Luciano A. Marraffini,et al.  Cas9 specifies functional viral targets during CRISPR-Cas adaptation , 2015, Nature.

[26]  R. Terns,et al.  Cas9 function and host genome sampling in Type II-A CRISPR–Cas adaptation , 2015, Genes & development.

[27]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  RNA targeting by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas Csm complex of Thermus thermophilus. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[28]  A. Engelman,et al.  Retroviral Integrase Structure and DNA Recombination Mechanism , 2014, Microbiology spectrum.

[29]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Heteromeric transposase elements: generators of genomic islands across diverse bacteria , 2014, Molecular microbiology.

[30]  D. C. Swarts,et al.  The evolutionary journey of Argonaute proteins , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  Rongguang Zhang,et al.  Structures of CRISPR Cas3 offer mechanistic insights into Cascade-activated DNA unwinding and degradation , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  A. Aravin,et al.  Prokaryotic Argonautes defend genomes against invasive DNA. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[33]  E. Koonin,et al.  Casposons: a new superfamily of self-synthesizing DNA transposons at the origin of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas immunity , 2014, BMC Biology.

[34]  Samuel H Sternberg,et al.  CasA mediates Cas3-catalyzed target degradation during CRISPR RNA-guided interference , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Structure and activity of the RNA-targeting Type III-B CRISPR-Cas complex of Thermus thermophilus. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[36]  J. Berger,et al.  Mechanisms for initiating cellular DNA replication. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  N. Craig,et al.  Direct interaction between the TnsA and TnsB subunits controls the heteromeric Tn7 transposase , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Comparative genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Xu Peng,et al.  A novel interference mechanism by a type IIIB CRISPR‐Cmr module in Sulfolobus , 2013, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  Andrew Camilli,et al.  A bacteriophage encodes its own CRISPR/Cas adaptive response to evade host innate immunity , 2013, Nature.

[41]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[42]  Narmada Thanki,et al.  CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  M. Hamidian,et al.  AbaR4 replaces AbaR3 in a carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolate belonging to global clone 1 from an Australian hospital. , 2011, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[44]  Stephen C. J. Parker,et al.  DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[45]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2001 .

[46]  N. Craig,et al.  Architecture of the Tn7 posttransposition complex: an elaborate nucleoprotein structure. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Adi Stern,et al.  Self-targeting by CRISPR: gene regulation or autoimmunity? , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[48]  N. Craig,et al.  Characterization of the TnsD-attTn7 complex that promotes site-specific insertion of Tn7 , 2010, Mobile DNA.

[49]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments , 2010, PloS one.

[50]  Alexander Rose.  TnAbaR1: a novel Tn7-related transposon in Acinetobacter baumannii that contributes to the accumulation and dissemination of large repertoires of resistance genes , 2010 .

[51]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Transposition into Replicating DNA Occurs through Interaction with the Processivity Factor , 2009, Cell.

[52]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[53]  E. Sontheimer,et al.  Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs , 2009, Cell.

[54]  Shiraz A. Shah,et al.  Distribution of CRISPR spacer matches in viruses and plasmids of crenarchaeal acidothermophiles and implications for their inhibitory mechanism. , 2009, Biochemical Society transactions.

[55]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Tn7 elements: engendering diversity from chromosomes to episomes. , 2009, Plasmid.

[56]  E. Koonin,et al.  Origins and evolution of eukaryotic RNA interference. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[58]  Alejandro A. Schäffer,et al.  Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches , 2008, Bioinform..

[59]  T. Honda,et al.  Precise Region and the Character of the Pathogenicity Island in Clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strains , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[60]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Transposon Tn7 Directs Transposition into the Genome of Filamentous Bacteriophage M13 Using the Element-Encoded TnsE Protein , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[61]  Ibtissem Grissa,et al.  CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[62]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  PILER-CR: Fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[63]  H. Cerutti,et al.  On the origin and functions of RNA-mediated silencing: from protists to man , 2006, Current Genetics.

[64]  N. Grishin,et al.  A putative RNA-interference-based immune system in prokaryotes: computational analysis of the predicted enzymatic machinery, functional analogies with eukaryotic RNAi, and hypothetical mechanisms of action , 2006, Biology Direct.

[65]  Johannes Söding,et al.  Protein homology detection by HMM?CHMM comparison , 2005, Bioinform..

[66]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  M. Belfort,et al.  Retrotransposition of the Ll.LtrB group II intron proceeds predominantly via reverse splicing into DNA targets , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[68]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[69]  N. Craig,et al.  Selective recognition of pyrimidine motif triplexes by a protein encoded by the bacterial transposon Tn7. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  J. E. Peters,et al.  Tn7 recognizes transposition target structures associated with DNA replication using the DNA-binding protein TnsE. , 2001, Genes & development.

[71]  N. Craig,et al.  Target DNA structure plays a critical role in Tn7 transposition , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[72]  F. Dyda,et al.  Unexpected structural diversity in DNA recombination: the restriction endonuclease connection. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[73]  N. Craig,et al.  Recognition of triple-helical DNA structures by transposon Tn7. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  E. Raleigh,et al.  A simple in vitro Tn7-based transposition system with low target site selectivity for genome and gene analysis. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[75]  S. Minakhina,et al.  Tn5053 family transposons are res site hunters sensing plasmidal res sites occupied by cognate resolvases , 1999, Molecular microbiology.

[76]  M. Belfort,et al.  Retrohoming of a Bacterial Group II Intron Mobility via Complete Reverse Splicing, Independent of Homologous DNA Recombination , 1998, Cell.

[77]  N. Craig,et al.  Gain-of-function mutations in TnsC, an ATP-dependent transposition protein that activates the bacterial transposon Tn7. , 1997, Genetics.

[78]  S. Krimigis,et al.  Electron Beams and Ion Composition Measured at Io and in Its Torus , 1996, Science.

[79]  R. Deboy,et al.  Conjugating plasmids are preferred targets for Tn7. , 1996, Genes & development.

[80]  N. Craig,et al.  Switching from Cut-and-Paste to Replicative Tn7 Transposition , 1996, Science.

[81]  N. Craig,et al.  Multiple DNA processing reactions underlie Tn7 transposition. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[82]  N. Craig,et al.  Transposition : Target DNA Recognition Is Mediated by Multiple Tn 7-Encoded Proteins in a Purified In Vitro System , 2003 .

[83]  N. Craig,et al.  Interaction of the Tn7-encoded transposition protein TnsB with the ends of the transposon. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[84]  E N Trifonov,et al.  The multiple codes of nucleotide sequences. , 1989, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[85]  N. Craig,et al.  Tn7 transposition: two transposition pathways directed by five Tn7-encoded genes. , 1988, Genes & development.

[86]  N. Craig,et al.  Sequence requirements of Escherichia coli attTn7, a specific site of transposon Tn7 insertion , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.