Environmental impact of two electrical products with reference to the energy-using products directive

High energy consumption is one of the major factors that contributes to global warming. Connected to this, a directive has been approved by the European Union for establishing a legal framework to govern eco-design of energy-using products. This technical note reveals life cycle analysis of two electrical products, which rely on the same rechargeable battery system (i.e. the same energy source) for operations, with respect to the requirements of the aforementioned directive. Results concur with the argument that energy consumption of this sort of product plays a dominant role in terms of a variety of environmental impacts (like emission to air). Based on the results of this study, eco-design alternatives can be derived accordingly so that energy consumption and the existing solution can be benchmarked, as required by the directive.

[1]  Winifred Ijomah,et al.  Application of active disassembly to extend profitable remanufacturing in small electrical and electronic products , 2010 .

[2]  Masataka Yoshimura,et al.  Construction of an optimum system design method considering product lifecycle , 2009 .

[3]  Sung-hoon Ahn,et al.  Computer-aided environmental design system for the energy-using product (EuP) directive , 2010 .

[4]  Andreas Lange,et al.  LCA Study and Environmental Benefits for Low Temperature Disinfection Process in Commercial Laundry (12 pp) , 2007 .

[5]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  An environmental assessment framework with respect to the Requirements of Energy-using Products Directive , 2008 .

[6]  Floyd Guyton Patterson Life Cycle Concept , 2005 .

[7]  D. Alting,et al.  The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis for Sustainable Industrial Production , 1993 .

[8]  Casper Boks,et al.  User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[9]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Integration of environmental aspects in product development: a stepwise procedure based on quantitative life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[10]  Slah Msahli,et al.  Design concept for an ecological relaxing textile product using solar energy , 2010 .

[11]  Visvaldas Varžinskas,et al.  Implementation of Legal Requirements for Energy Using Products (EuP) in Lithuanian Industry: Problems and Possibilities , 2010 .

[12]  Alexander Verl,et al.  A generic energy consumption model for decision making and energy efficiency optimisation in manufacturing , 2009 .

[13]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A pro-active and collaborative approach to reverse logistics—a case study , 2007 .

[14]  D. Maxwell,et al.  Developing sustainable products and services , 2003 .

[15]  Chris Edwards Watch your watts , 2008 .

[16]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Design for Environment — Do We Get the Focus Right? , 2004 .

[17]  R. Wever,et al.  Designing cradle-to-cradle products: a reality check , 2010 .

[18]  P. Pedrazzoli,et al.  Towards an integrated framework for sustainable innovation , 2008 .

[19]  E. Westkämper,et al.  Life Cycle Management and Assessment: Approaches and Visions Towards Sustainable Manufacturing (keynote paper) , 2000 .

[20]  Taeko Aoe,et al.  Eco-efficiency and ecodesign in electrical and electronic products , 2007 .

[21]  Michela Gallo,et al.  The Application of the Environmental Product Declaration of Waste Disposal in a Sanitary Landfill: 4 Case Studies , 2007 .

[22]  Michela Gallo,et al.  The Application of the Environmental Product Declaration to Waste Disposal in a Sanitary Landfill - Four Case Studies (10 pp) , 2007 .

[23]  Masataka Yoshimura,et al.  Multiobjective optimisation method for life-cycle design of mechanical products , 2010 .