A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces

The cause of reproductive isolation between biological species is a major issue in the field of biology. Most explanations of hybrid sterility require either genetic incompatibilities between nascent species or gross physical imbalances between their chromosomes, such as rearrangements or ploidy changes. An alternative possibility is that genomes become incompatible at a molecular level, dependent on interactions between primary DNA sequences. The mismatch repair system has previously been shown to contribute to sterility in a hybrid between established yeast species by preventing successful meiotic crossing‐over leading to aneuploidy. This system could also promote or reinforce the formation of new species in a similar manner, by making diverging genomes incompatible in meiosis. To test this possibility we crossed yeast strains of the same species but from diverse historical or geographic sources. We show that these crosses are partially sterile and present evidence that the mismatch repair system is largely responsible for this sterility.

[1]  R. Reenan,et al.  Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. , 1992, Genetics.

[2]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Differentiation of European and Far East Asian populations of Saccharomyces paradoxus by allozyme analysis. , 1997, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[3]  J. Drake,et al.  Rates of spontaneous mutation. , 1998, Genetics.

[4]  A. Templeton MECHANISMS OF SPECIATION­ A POPULATION GENETIC APPROACH , 1981 .

[5]  G. Parker,et al.  Sexual conflict and speciation. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  M. Radman Mismatch repair and the fidelity of genetic recombination. , 1989, Genome.

[7]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[8]  R. Reenan,et al.  Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Genetics.

[9]  E. Louis III. Yeast sequencing reports. Corrected sequence for the right telomere of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III , 1994 .

[10]  S. Oliver,et al.  Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces , 2000, Nature.

[11]  R H Borts,et al.  Mlh1 is unique among mismatch repair proteins in its ability to promote crossing-over during meiosis. , 1997, Genes & development.

[12]  S. Nelson,et al.  Genomic mismatch scanning: a new approach to genetic linkage mapping , 1993, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Marc P. Waase,et al.  Analysis of conditional mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH1 gene in mismatch repair and in meiotic crossing over. , 2002, Genetics.

[14]  B. Harfe,et al.  DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. , 2000, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  P. Ross-Macdonald,et al.  The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. , 2001, Genetics.

[16]  J. Haber,et al.  Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product. , 1990, Genetics.

[17]  P. Ross-Macdonald,et al.  Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction , 1994, Cell.

[18]  R. Borts,et al.  Meiotic recombination frequencies are affected by nutritional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Genetic and molecular analysis of hybrids in the genus Saccharomyces involving S. cerevisiae, S. uvarum and a new species, S. douglasii , 1994, Yeast.

[20]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Nature.

[21]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Jasin,et al.  Repair of Double-Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination in Mismatch Repair-Defective Mammalian Cells , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  R. Borts,et al.  The many faces of mismatch repair in meiosis. , 2000, Mutation research.

[25]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[26]  J. Strathern,et al.  A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genetics.

[27]  D. Greig,et al.  Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  S. Jinks-Robertson,et al.  The role of the mismatch repair machinery in regulating mitotic and meiotic recombination between diverged sequences in yeast. , 1999, Genetics.

[29]  J. Mallet,et al.  What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Roeder Gs Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango , 1997 .

[31]  M. Radman,et al.  Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer , 1995, Cell.

[32]  Chau-Ti Ting,et al.  Genes and speciation , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  J. Game,et al.  Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. , 1985, Genetics.

[34]  G. Dover,et al.  Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution , 1982, Nature.

[35]  L. New,et al.  Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Genetics.

[36]  P. Sniegowski Mismatch repair: Origin of species? , 1998, Current Biology.

[37]  R. Lenski,et al.  Mutation, recombination, and incipient speciation of bacteria in the laboratory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R. Borts,et al.  The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[39]  Paul B Rainey,et al.  Studies of Adaptive Radiation Using Model Microbial Systems , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[40]  G. A. Horridge,et al.  Animal species and evolution. , 1964 .

[41]  Jac A. Nickoloff,et al.  Gene Conversion Tracts from Double-Strand Break Repair in Mammalian Cells , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[42]  C. Gaillardin,et al.  Genetic and karyotypic identification of Saccharomyces yeasts from Far East Asia , 1993 .

[43]  J. Haber,et al.  crl mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resemble both mutants affecting general control of amino acid biosynthesis and omnipotent translational suppressor mutants. , 1988, Genetics.

[44]  E. Louis,et al.  Nonrecombinant meiosis I nondisjunction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by tRNA ochre suppressors. , 1989, Genetics.

[45]  J R Johnston,et al.  Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. , 1986, Genetics.

[46]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife: The Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. , 1983 .

[47]  J. Haber,et al.  Cycloheximide-resistant temperature-sensitive lethal mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1988, Genetics.

[48]  R. Liskay,et al.  Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[49]  M. Radman,et al.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants , 1989, Nature.

[50]  T. Lukácsovich,et al.  Suppression of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells by small degrees of sequence divergence. , 1999, Genetics.

[51]  F. Taddei,et al.  Molecular keys to speciation: DNA polymorphism and the control of genetic exchange in enterobacteria. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  S. Fogel,et al.  Cloning and nucleotide sequence of DNA mismatch repair gene PMS1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: homology of PMS1 to procaryotic MutL and HexB , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[53]  G. Roeder Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. , 1997, Genes & development.

[54]  Jerry A. Coyne,et al.  Genetics and speciation , 1992, Nature.

[55]  E. Louis,et al.  The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[56]  J. Haber,et al.  Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. , 1987, Science.

[57]  S. Jinks-Robertson,et al.  Mismatch Repair Proteins Regulate Heteroduplex Formation during Mitotic Recombination in Yeast , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[58]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Molecular Biological Mechanisms of Speciation , 1983, Science.

[59]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  A genic view of species integration , 2001 .

[60]  M. Dutreix,et al.  (CA/TG) microsatellite sequences escape the inhibition of recombination by mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[61]  Chung-I Wu The genic view of the process of speciation , 2001 .