Conflict Resolution Automation and Pilot Situation Awareness

This study compared pilot situation awareness across three traffic management concepts that varied traffic separation responsibility between the pilots, air-traffic controllers, and an automation system. In Concept 1, the flight deck was equipped with conflict resolution tools that enable them to perform the tasks of weather avoidance and self-separation from surrounding traffic. In Concept 2, air-traffic controllers were responsible for traffic separation, but pilots were provided tools for weather and traffic avoidance. In Concept 3, a ground based automation was used for conflict detection and resolution, and the flight deck tools allowed pilots to deviate for weather, but not detect conflicts. Results showed that pilot situation awareness was highest in Concept 1, where the pilots were most engaged, and lowest in Concept 3, where automation was heavily used. These findings suggest that pilot situation awareness on conflict resolution tasks can be improved by keeping them in the decision-making loop.

[1]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  Summer L. Brandt,et al.  The Impact of Automation Assisted Aircraft Separation on Situation Awareness , 2009, HCI.

[3]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  Development and Integration of a Human-Centered Volumetric Cockpit Situation Display for Distributed Air-Ground Operations , 2005 .

[4]  Thomas Prevot,et al.  Initial Evaluation of NextGen Air/Ground Operations with Ground-Based Automated Separation Assurance , 2009 .

[5]  村田 和義,et al.  HCI International 2009 , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[6]  Andrew R. Dattel,et al.  Does Situation Awareness Add to the Validity of Cognitive Tests? , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[7]  E. Jeannot,et al.  The Development of Situation Awareness Measures in ATM Systems , 2003 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Automated Conflict Resolution For Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[11]  Shimon Y. Nof,et al.  Cultural Factors in Systems Design: Decision Making and Action , 2011 .

[12]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Making and Action , 1998 .

[13]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Factors Influencing the Decisions and Actions of Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers in Three Plausible NextGen Environments , 2011 .

[14]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Comprehension and Situation Awareness , 2008 .

[15]  Vernol Battiste,et al.  Development and Integration of Human-Centered Conflict Detection and Resolution Tools for Airborne Autonomous Operations , 2005 .

[16]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  COMPARING SITUATION AWARENESS MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN A LOW FIDELITY AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIMULATION , 2008 .

[17]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Impact of Conflict Avoidance Responsibility Allocation on Pilot Workload in a Distributed Air Traffic Management System , 2010 .

[18]  Terence S. Abbott Speed Control Law for Precision Terminal Area In-Trail Self Spacing , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas Prevot Exploring the Many Perspectives of Distributed Air Traffic Management: The Multi Aircraft Control System MACS , 2002 .