Do we have enough data? Robust reliability via uncertainty quantification

Abstract A generalised probabilistic framework is proposed for reliability assessment and uncertainty quantification under a lack of data. The developed computational tool allows the effect of epistemic uncertainty to be quantified and has been applied to assess the reliability of an electronic circuit and a power transmission network. The strength and weakness of the proposed approach are illustrated by comparison to traditional probabilistic approaches. In the presence of both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, classic probabilistic approaches may lead to misleading conclusions and a false sense of confidence which may not fully represent the quality of the available information. In contrast, generalised probabilistic approaches are versatile and powerful when linked to a computational tool that permits their applicability to realistic engineering problems.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  Marco de Angelis,et al.  Uncertainty Management in Multidisciplinary Design of Critical Safety Systems , 2015, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Risk assessment and risk-cost optimization of distributed power generation systems considering extreme weather conditions , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  V. Kreinovich,et al.  Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses , 2013 .

[5]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Basics of the Monte Carlo Method with Application to System Reliability , 2002 .

[6]  M.-R. Haghifam,et al.  Failure rate estimation of overhead electric distribution lines considering data deficiency and population variability , 2015 .

[7]  Mohamed Sallak,et al.  Extended Component Importance Measures Considering Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[8]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  COSSAN: A Multidisciplinary Software Suite for Uncertainty Quantification and Risk Management , 2017 .

[10]  Ming Yang,et al.  Interval Estimation for Conditional Failure Rates of Transmission Lines With Limited Samples , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  A Generalization of Bayesian Inference , 1968, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[12]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A risk-based simulation and multi-objective optimization framework for the integration of distributed renewable generation and storage , 2014 .

[13]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[14]  Yakov Ben-Haim,et al.  Robust rationality and decisions under severe uncertainty , 2000, J. Frankl. Inst..

[15]  G.P. Dimuro,et al.  Towards interval analysis of the load uncertainty in power electric systems , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[16]  Aurélien Hot,et al.  An info-gap application to robust design of a prestressed space structure under epistemic uncertainties , 2017 .

[17]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Constructing Probability Boxes and Dempster-Shafer Structures , 2003 .

[18]  G. Schuëller,et al.  The use of kernel densities and confidence intervals to cope with insufficient data in validation experiments , 2008 .

[19]  Thomas Augustin.  Optimal decisions under complex uncertainty – basic notions and a general algorithm for data‐based decision making with partial prior knowledge described by interval probability , 2004 .

[20]  Tazid Ali,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Using Double Monte Carlo Method , 2012 .

[21]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[22]  Edoardo Patelli,et al.  Editorial: Engineering analysis with vague and imprecise information , 2015 .

[23]  Sukumar Devotta,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of transport of water and pesticide in an unsaturated layered soil profile using fuzzy set theory , 2009 .